SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved EEG Spatial Resolution via the Normal E-field

Award identifier 9463d75d274b9bac816f2338c88f436df79dbeac92f5acee2ef760bcb7bb0ed0Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$138,426

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
QUANTUM APPLIED SCIENCE & RESEARCH INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
GWGDBN4PE928
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Measurement of the complete 3-component electric (E-) field vector has very recently become possible through the development of sensors that can measure free-space electric potential at the sub-microvolt level. This technology has been applied to through-clothing measurement of ECG, with successful preliminary measurements for EEG and ERP. Analysis has already shown that the normal E-field, En, produced by brain sources is more tightly focused in space than the tangential field from the same source when measured through the head. The goal of Phase I is to quantify how a measurement of the E-field in the direction normal to the scalp can be applied to replace or augment conventional electric potential data collected on the scalp surface. 3 specific analysis issues of relevance for EEG, ERP brain source imaging will be investigated. Synthetic data, including sensor effects, will be generated by a sophisticated three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulation supported by analytic calculations. The benefit of measuring the E-field will be quantified by analyzing the data with and without the normal field information, using a modified form of the Brainstorm program. In Phase II, a new type of EEG electrode system that includes sensors of the normal electric field will be constructed together with algorithms that utilize the En information. The system will be directly compared with a 120- electrode Geodesic Sensor Net System on subjects participating in standard evoked potential and EEG experiments. The ability to measure the normal E-field external to the head provides an entirely separate new channel of information about the electrical sources in the brain. If successful this program will contribute to the whole art of EEG signal acquisition, providing a general advance in research and clinical measurement technology. In addition, because the method operates off the body, it should lead to greater patient comfort and facilitate non-medical applications of brain signal measurement, such as alertness monitoring and cognitive state assessment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

68 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $29,034,619. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.