SBIR/STTR Research Award

Mental Health Assessment and Dynamic Referral for Oncology (MHADRO)

Award identifier 820b139c20244fff0fb0465c314bf492cde142dadf039bc79cc07f3971888f81Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,446,420

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
POLARIS HEALTH DIRECTIONS, INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2009-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): According to the American Cancer Society, approximately 1.3 million people are diagnosed with cancer each year, with the annual cost of treating cancer exceeding 60.9 billion. Mental health and psychosocial factors associated with cancer are poorly recognized and under-treated. The Mental Health Assessment and Dynamic Referral for Oncology (MHADRO) enables oncology treatment providers to efficiently screen for and monitor five important patient care domains, including: (1) mental health functioning; (2) cancer-related physical symptoms/side effects; (3) the patient-provider partnership; (4) barriers to treatment; and (5) adherence with medical regimen and lifestyle change recommendations. The MHADRO's individualized summary reports help oncology treatment providers to decide whether and how to intervene when clinically elevated mental health symptoms are present or when a patient reports a desire for treatment or support. Patients who choose the dynamic referral have their summary report, an authorization to release information, and their personal contact information electronically transmitted to a credentialed mental health provider, who is then responsible for contacting the patient to discuss treatment options. This process utilizes secure, HIPAA-compliant transmittal technologies. Phase 2 specific aims are: (1) Make design improvements based on Phase 1 results; (2) Test the improved MHADRO with a field trial of 30 patients selected from three participating oncology treatment centers; and (3) Evaluate the effectiveness of the MHADRO during a single blind, randomized controlled trial of 1,000 mixed cancer patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to the Intervention Group (n=500) or the Control Group (n=500). All subjects, regardless of group assignment, will undergo the same assessment procedures at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months post-baseline. Those assigned to the Intervention Group will have their Healthcare Provider Reports printed at each of the five assessments. These reports will be reviewed by their oncology treatment team and a treatment plan will be developed for distressed patients. The patient will receive a Patient Feedback Report, which will be reviewed with him or her by a trained research coordinator (a healthcare professional). During the assessment, the Intervention Group subjects will be given the opportunity to obtain more information on available psychosocial support groups and offered a dynamic referral to a psychiatrist, mental health counselor, and/or smoking cessation program. Subjects assigned to the Control Condition will undergo the same five MHADRO assessments. However, their reports will not be printed, nor will they be offered the mental health referrals or psychosocial support group information. Rather, they will be managed using the standard of care provided at the site (i.e., treatment-as-usual). We will use Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and Linear Mixed Modeling (LMM) to examine group differences in distress over time, while adjusting for potential confounding variables such as illness severity and phase of treatment. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Several national organizations, including the National Comprehensive Care Network, the National Cancer Institute, and the Institute of Medicine, have advocated routine screening for psychological distress among cancer patients and have emphasized the central role of building a collaborative patient-provider partnership to address psychosocial issues. The lack of consistent assessment of psychosocial factors and the patient-provider partnership is a significant problem with far-reaching consequences, including excess suffering, impaired quality of life, treatment dissatisfaction, and treatment non-adherence. The MHADRO has the potential to impact these outcomes through identifying distressed patients, helping the team decide what action should be taken, strengthening the patient-provider partnership, producing a personalized patient feedback report, facilitating mental health treatment engagement, and monitoring patients' response to treatment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.