SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Antifungals by Engineering the AbA NRPS gene

Award identifier 2533f41b768a9808f9db547f9319bef11a54bdffce283e786ede6bb18587f460Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,978,700

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
AUREOGEN, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NETHCTLPJSR4
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): There is an immediate need for novel drugs for the treatment of fungal infections, (antibiotics resistant) bacterial infections, and cancer. Cyclic peptides constitute a class of compounds that have made crucial contributions to the treatment of these diseases. Although cyclic peptides can be very efficient drugs, they are complex natural products and as such, difficult and expensive to optimize with conventional, chemistry- based methodologies. Currently used compounds are either native or native with minor modifications. Hence, the full potential of cyclic peptides for the treatment of human diseases has not been explored. The overall goal of the project is to develop a cost-effective production system for a novel antifungal drug. This molecule is a cyclic peptide and although it is both potent and well-tolerated, it requires structural modifications that cannot be introduced in a cost-effective manner by synthetic chemistry, to become a marketable product. Thus, the project involves development of methodologies and a set of genetic tools that will allow introduction of the required modifications by engineering of the non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) complex responsible for synthesis of the molecule, in the producer organism. In Phase I, the gene encoding this NRPS complex was identified, cloned, sequenced and mapped. Phase II will involve modifying this gene such that the resulting, engineered organism will produce a drug molecule(s) with the properties required for a marketable product. Notably, successful engineering of the (NRPS gene in the) producer organism will allow production of this drug molecule at a fraction of the cost of synthetic chemistry thereby ensuring the successful commercialization of a potent, cidal antifungal drug with a novel mode of action. Successful generation of the engineered drug producer organism will: [1] provide an efficient, well-tolerated drug to a market with a strong demand for new products; [2] address a very immediate need from a growing patient population which currently have very few treatment options; and [3] provide proof of concept and critical tools for a novel and potentially very powerful genetic engineering approach to the discovery of new and improved therapeutics.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2011). Reported award amounts total $3,891,025. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.