SBIR/STTR Research Award

ST-246 treatment of smallpox vaccine-related adverse events in murine models

Award identifier 635f938201f671b4209089791ed3ab4b0d0e233f806bd8a65ee98534d61f1282Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$293,399

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
VJRNRTSL22K4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The renewed threat of smallpox as a bioweapon and the emerging zoonotic threat of monkeypox highlight the need for effective poxvirus countermeasures. Use of the smallpox vaccine poses a serious health risk, especially for the immunocompromised, or those with eczema/atopic dermatitis. It is our long-term goal to establish a safe and effective vaccine regimen that includes the use of the currently approved, efficacious smallpox vaccine and an antiviral drug to prevent or treat adverse events particularly in the aforementioned high-risk populations. We hypothesize that co-administration of the smallpox vaccine and ST-246, an antiviral drug, to inhibit viral dissemination from the original site of inoculation, will significantly reduce vaccine-related pathologies in immunodeficient and eczematous hosts without compromising protective immunity elicited by the vaccine. Our hypothesis extends from previous observations: First, lethal poxvirus infections in humans and in animal models results from dissemination from the original site of inoculation and wide-spread systemic infection. Second, treatment of a normally lethal poxvirus infection, with ST-246, a drug that specifically blocks viral dissemination, is fully protective in numerous animal models. Third, we have completed pilot studies performed in immunocompetent mice, demonstrating that protective immunity elicited by the Dryvax(r) smallpox vaccine is in no way compromised by ST-246 and may in fact be enhanced. It remains to be seen whether ST-246 actually reduces the occurrence of vaccine-related adverse events. To evaluate whether ST-246 may improve the safety of the smallpox vaccine without compromising protective immunity, we propose to utilize murine models for immunodeficiency and eczema/atopic dermatitis as hosts for poxvirus challenge and ST-246 treatment. Toward this end, the following specific aims are proposed: 1. Evaluate the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of ST-246 in vaccinia-challenged murine models of B and T cell immunodeficiency. 2. Evaluate the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of ST-246 in vaccinia-challenged murine models of eczema/atopic dermatitis. 3. Analyze protective immune responses elicited by vaccination in combination with ST- 246 in immunodeficient and eczematous mice.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2009). Reported award amounts total $16,351,621. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.