SBIR/STTR Research Award

Use of Cellulase-containing Maize to Lower Cost of Forest Products Biofuels

Award identifier 8941fe4c061e2e60a56202ec13b825751c8aed87a09967aa8c22c5b70c44d95dAwarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$99,983

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Applied Biotechnology Institute, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
XNMLFC55AWN3
Solicitation number
USDA-NIFA-SBIR-003497
Topic code
8.1

Research abstract

Fossilized hydrocarbon-based energy sources such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas provide a limited, non-renewable resource pool. This creates a somewhat precarious situation in today's political climate because supply disruptions are highly likely and could cripple the ability of our economy to function. This is regarded as a national security issue. Renewable plant biomass-derived energy resources as an alternative to fossil fuels make economic, environmental and political sense, and should be investigated for moving the economy toward new energy sources. Cellulosic feedstocks can be derived from either forest or agricultural products. Forest products could replace approximately 30% of the transportation fuels in the US. Forest biomass sources can come from an energy crop but they may also be derived from forest waste or by-products such as wood chips, sawdust or waste paper pulp which account for approximately half of the total forest products. These by-products can account for approximately 15 billion gallons of ethanol making a significant impact on the reduction of fossil fuel. The hurdle in the conversion of cellulosic biomass into biofuels is an ample supply of a low-cost biomass. It is the subject of this proposal to reduce the enzyme cost and exploit the advantages of using pretreated wood products to develop an integrated program that can enable cost-efficient cellulosic ethanol production. The critical enzyme source, cellulases, will be provided from a by-product of the current grain ethanol process, corn germ. Cellulases produced in the germ appear to be a particularly attractive source of enzymes that can be exploited to reduce microbial enzyme costs. These enzymes will be optimized with current commercial microbial enzymes to determine the lowest cost of enzymes. This approach will not add additional stress on the environment or require additional inputs for the crop to produce the materials necessary to make biofuels. Instead the focus is on using material already in agricultural production but underutilized or allowed to go to waste. In this way, the practice does not compete for current uses of food or fuel. This will lead to a more efficient use of our natural resources and eliminate additional inputs for agricultural products that can create additional stress on the environment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2021). Reported award amounts total $6,251,515. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.