SBIR/STTR Research Award

BIOADHESIVE BARRIER FOR THE PREVENTION OF ADHESIONS

Award identifier 8c7fa008547972ffc400186f709e3a7e42a563455afd55fd1f7a0b700e86b77bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Fziomed, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (Adapted from applicant's abstract): Adhesive disease is a significant problem in current medical practice. Implantable biomaterials, serving as barriers between healing serosal surfaces and fibrin clots, are considered a viable solution to the problem. Following a research plan incorporating physicochemical and mechanical tests, as well as analytical separation techniques, MedDev Corporation will develop optimized bioadhesive barrier materials. The viscous fluid/gel or membrane materials are blends of carboxymethylcellulose and polyethylene oxide, internally stabilized through hydrogen bonding. Bioadhesiveness will be studied in an in-vitro tissue coating model. Optimized materials will be tested in two standard animal models for adhesions and scar formation in spinal and abdominal surgery. $ = TOTAL AWARD AMTS & NOT LIMITED TO PORTION OF PROJECT RELATED TO SUBJECT OF SEARCH SUBPROJECT $ = TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT DIVIDED BY NUMBER OF SUBPROJECTS SOURCE: CRISP FORMAT F FY 97 LAST UPDATE 04-07-98 1QUERY 1536 ID SEARCH 06/01/98 PAGE 117 --PROJECT NUMBER......2 R44 CA60198-02A1 INVESTIGATOR NAME/ADDRESS FY 97 DIAS, PETER B IRG/INTRAMURAL UNIT..ZRG2 MEDINOX, INC AWARD AMOUNT......... $308,063 SUITE E SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION: MEDINOX, INC. TITLE MABS TO MYOD FAMILY PROTEINS IN MYOGENIC TUMOR DIAGNOSIS ABSTRACT: It is difficult to diagnose poorly differentiated rhabdomyosarcomas from other small round cell tumors and to identify subtypes of rhabdomyosarcomas that confer poor prognosis. Through SBIR Phase-I funding we developed and characterized monoclonal antibodies that are highly specific to MyoD, for distinguishing rhabdomyosarcomas from other malignancies. Our preliminary data using a monoclonal antibody to myogenin shows that there is a highly significant difference (p=0.0001) in staining between embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas. We have also developed monoclonal antibodies specific to myf5 and myf6. We propose that spatio-temporal patterns of expression of members of the MyoD family (myf5, MyoD, myogenin and myf6) observed during development are reflected in rhabdomyosarcoma and may be responsible for the histologically and clinically distinct subtypes. for the Phase II study we will (1) test the diagnostic utility of monoclonal antibodies to MyoD on a large number of small round, spindle and anaplastic cell, pediatric and adult malignancies. Using the same tumor material we will also test (2) the diagnostic utility of monoclonal antibodies specific to myogenin, myf5 and myf6 for diagnosing rhabdomyosarcomas from other malignancies, (3) for distinguishing between the clinically distinct subtypes of rhabdomyosarcomas and (4) for predicting prognosis.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.