SBIR/STTR Research Award

DEVELOPMENT OF A FLIGHT SIMULATOR VISUAL SYSTEM RECORDING/EVALUATION DEVICE

Award identifier 79d2e85b90f49057814886ad588630fc0ae5ed7dfdc53506808c7c6e91a804d7Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$494,880

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1993

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Epic Sales, Inc. Dba Epic Systems
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES HAVE PLACED GREATER DEMANDS ON ABILITY TO MAINTAIN TOLERANCES ON SIMULATOR SUBSYSTEMS (E.G., RESPONSES OF VISUAL AND MOTION BASE SYSTEMS AND THEIR INTERACTION). A SYSTEM TO RECORD VISUAL SCENES IN FLIGHT SIMULATORS, WHICH INCLUDES MAN-INTHE-LOOP, IS NEEDED FOR RDTE AND ACQUISITION OF THESE TRAINING SYSTEMS. SUCH A SYSTEM WOULD BE EMPLOYED TO DETECT CHANGES IN SYSTEM OUTPUT (I.E., RUNNING OUT OF TOLERANCE) AND TO MEASURE ELEMENTS OF THE VISUAL SCENE WHICH MAY NOT BE OBSERVABLE TO TEST PILOTS, BUT WHICH INFLUENCE SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE. WE PROPOSE TO SYNTHESIZE TWO APPROACHES TO THIS REQUIREMENT: (1) A METHOD IN WHICH HUMAN OUTPUT IS USED TO MONITOR SYSTEM OUTPUT, AND (2) USE OF ENGINEERING MEASURES TO MONITOR SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE AND OPERATOR HEAD MOVEMENTS. IN PHASE I, WE WILL DEMONSTRATE THE FEASIBILITY OF RECORDING BOTH OF THESE MEASURES IN REAL TIME AND WILL SHOW THAT MORE SOPHISTICATED ANALYSIS CAN BE PERFORMED. THESE LATTER INCLUDE FOR PHASE II ISOLATING EYE MOVEMENTS PLUS STICK AND OTHER CONTROL MOVEMENTS USING MULTIDIMENSIONAL DATA STRUCTURES COMPOSED FOR IMAGES OR THE ELECTRICAL SIGNALS THAT GENERATE IMAGES. THE HUMAN PERFORMANCE METHOD WILL BE EVALUATED ACCORDING TO CRITERIA SUCH AS RELIABILITY, DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITY, INTRUSIVENESS, AND COST. IN PHASE II, WE PROPOSE TO COMPARE THE HUMAN PERFORMANCE METHODOLOGY AGAINST ON-LINE ENGINEERING MONITORING OF SIMULATOR SYSTEMS. BOTH METHODS WILL BE RATED BY A GROUP OF ENGINEERS AND HUMAN FACTORS SPECIALISTS ACCORDING TO CRITERIA WHICH INCLUDE VALIDITY, PRACTICALITY OF RECOVERING THE NECESSARY DATA FROM PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS AND/OR FROM COMPUTERS (GIVEN A DIVERSE SET OF SIMULATOR TYPES), COST, RELIABILITY, AND DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITY.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.