SBIR/STTR Research Award

DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL DUCT INJECTION PROCESS FOR SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL OF SO2 AND NOX FROM POWER PLANT FLUE GASES

Award identifier df95a396a68429debf3cc437e089e02e40d0ce054692c7585600684d1ed4543fAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$49,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1991

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Fossil Energy Res Corp
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH CORPORATION PROPOSES THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL DUCT INJECTION PROCESS FOR SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL OF SO2 AND NOX FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT FLUE GASES. IN THIS PROCESS, A MIXTURE OF LIME AND A PROPRIETARY SORBENT ISINJECTED EITHER DRY OR IN THE FORM OF A SLURRY INTO THE FLUEGAS DUCT BETWEEN THE AIR PREHEATER AND PARTICULATE COLLECTION DEVICE. LIME REMOVES SO2 AND THE PROPRIETARY SORBENT REMOVES NOX FROM THE FLUE GAS. THE NOX SEPARATED FROM THE FLUE GAS IS FED BACK TO THE BOILER WHERE IT IS REDUCED TO N2 AND H2O. THE UNUSED LIME AND MOST OF THE NOX SORBENT ARE RECOVERED AND RECYCLED. THE WASTE PRODUCT OF THE PROCESS IS A SOLID RESIDUE WHICH CONTAINS FLY ASH AND SULFATES OF CALCIUM. A ROUGH COST ESTIMATE SHOWED THAT THE PROPOSED DUCT INJECTION PROCESS HAS A POTENTIAL COST ADVANTAGE OF 60% - 70% WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER COMBINED SO2 AND NOX REMOVAL PROCESSES. FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH CORPORATION PROPOSES THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL DUCT INJECTION PROCESS FOR SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL OF SO2 AND NOX FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT FLUE GASES. IN THIS PROCESS, A MIXTURE OF LIME AND A PROPRIETARY SORBENT ISINJECTED EITHER DRY OR IN THE FORM OF A SLURRY INTO THE FLUEGAS DUCT BETWEEN THE AIR PREHEATER AND PARTICULATE COLLECTION DEVICE. LIME REMOVES SO2 AND THE PROPRIETARY SORBENT REMOVES NOX FROM THE FLUE GAS. THE NOX SEPARATED FROM THE FLUE GAS IS FED BACK TO THE BOILER WHERE IT IS REDUCED TO N2 AND H2O. THE UNUSED LIME AND MOST OF THE NOX SORBENT ARE RECOVERED AND RECYCLED. THE WASTE PRODUCT OF THE PROCESS IS A SOLID RESIDUE WHICH CONTAINS FLY ASH AND SULFATES OF CALCIUM. A ROUGH COST ESTIMATE SHOWED THAT THE PROPOSED DUCT INJECTION PROCESS HAS A POTENTIAL COST ADVANTAGE OF 60% - 70% WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER COMBINED SO2 AND NOX REMOVAL PROCESSES. FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH CORPORATION PROPOSES THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL DUCT INJECTION PROCESS FOR SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL OF SO2 AND NOX FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT FLUE GASES. IN THIS PROCESS, A MIXTURE OF LIME AND A PROPRIETARY SORBENT ISINJECTED EITHER DRY OR IN THE FORM OF A SLURRY INTO THE FLUEGAS DUCT BETWEEN THE AIR PREHEATER AND PARTICULATE COLLECTION DEVICE. LIME REMOVES SO2 AND THE PROPRIETARY SORBENT REMOVES NOX FROM THE FLUE GAS. THE NOX SEPARATED FROM THE FLUE GAS IS FED BACK TO THE BOILER WHERE IT IS REDUCED TO N2 AND H2O. THE UNUSED LIME AND MOST OF THE NOX SORBENT ARE RECOVERED AND RECYCLED. THE WASTE PRODUCT OF THE PROCESS IS A SOLID RESIDUE WHICH CONTAINS FLY ASH AND SULFATES OF CALCIUM. A ROUGH COST ESTIMATE SHOWED THAT THE PROPOSED DUCT INJECTION PROCESS HAS A POTENTIAL COST ADVANTAGE OF 60% - 70% WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER COMBINED SO2 AND NOX REMOVAL PROCESSES.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.