SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Personalized Messaging System for Cancer Screening

Award identifier 113e06f556bdaa1409be33bc2f352b642d6b1eaeb5e17f4a1747eba5fd6c95c8Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$149,448

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
RINGFUL LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PA11-096
Topic code
NCATS

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Adherence with prostate cancer screening (such as PSA tests, and physician follow-ups), is less than perfect. In large part, this is because members of at-risk populations need to keep track of which tests are requiredand at what time. As screening guidelines and timetables become more personalized (e.g. different recommendations for follow-up intervals depending on past history of PSA levels), such problems are likely to be exacerbated. Yet, there is a great deal of evidence that early screening and detection are key to better prognoses, lower mortality rates, and lower health-care expenditures. We propose to increase compliance with cancer screening, using prostate cancer as an example, through two-way rich media mobile messaging based on the personalized risk assessment. The product we propose to develop and test will store algorithms required to personalize cancer screening in a central database managed by a rule-based workflow engine, and implemented via messaging onthe patient's own mobile phone. Participants will receive a mobile message on the appropriate date stating that it is time for them to schedule and prostate cancer screening appointment with their doctor. Reminder messages will incorporate multimedia, such as a brief video interview with an expert, to reinforce the importance of screening. Participants will be asked to report the results of tests (for example PSA levels), by replying to the message on their mobile phone or by visiting a portal web site. The project will be piloted in a large rural hospital system providing primary and preventive care services, and be evaluated based on a randomized controlled efficacy trial, as well as pre- and post- measures of participant acceptance and engagement. If successful, phase II SBIR funding will be utilized to conduct a longitudinal trial to understand long term efficacy of the messaging intervention, and to develop and deliver messages relevant to screening for other types of cancer. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: We propose to build a technology solution that provides personalized cancer screening reminders via two-way rich media mobile messaging solutions. The solution personalizes each patient's screening schedule based on personal profile and past screeningresults, and use consumer mobile technology to engage patients. Such interactive reminders could provide a low cost solution for increasing adherence to cancer screening, and help differentiating patients that are at high risk of non-adherence for more aggressive follow-ups.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.