SBIR/STTR Research Award

WEB-BASED TRAINING & RELIABILITY FOR PSYCHIATRIC TRIALS

Award identifier fb9f6e360628d1d1f498bf99073724bfa13a4881ed4e1592360b5f6abb2de600Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,663

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2002

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
FOX LEARNING SYSTEMS, INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
HMTCQ9MG57M7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The important task of training raters and establishing and maintaining reliability for the duration of a psychiatric clinical trial is a major problem that is often ignored. This problem is particularly vexing for trials involving many raters at multiple sites. Furthermore, factors effecting rater expectancy (bias) with standard psychiatric rating instruments has never been fully explored. This proposal will develop an interactive video system that can train research raters to use rating instruments with shared rating conventions and assess interrater reliability across sites and over time. Programs will be written that will enable this video system to be used as (I) an interactive "tutorial" system that can provide immediate feedback to trainees, and (2) a "reliability testing" system, that uses an integrated database to record ratings and compute interrater reliability within an identified group of raters or with preset ratings ("a gold standard"). Phase I will create a prototype for assessing interrater reliability for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Using scripts from actual patient interviews, a male and a female actor will each portray three separate HDRS interviews reflecting depressive symptoms of various severity. The functionality of the prototype system will be assessed. In preparation for Phase II, feasibility will be established by 1) having experienced raters assess videos of the HDRS interviews of both actors and actual patients to establish the validity of the actors' portrayals. 2) assessing interrater reliability in a group of experienced raters and a group of novice raters using the system, and 3) assessing the positive and negative attributes of the system with both experienced and novice raters. Phase II will develop a complete library of 30 variations of the I-IDRS using 6 different actors of diverse age, gender and ethnicity and implement the tutorial system. The Phase II study will assess variability and rater bias as an interaction of demographic and professional characteristics of the raters and "patients." Future product development will utilize the software and statistical methodology with other rating instruments, including those used to assess schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, and dementia.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2022). Reported award amounts total $4,634,965. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.