SBIR/STTR Research Award

Methods Analyzing Categorical Data

Award identifier d1f721ee88784a1910f8e156662d9a10eedc63111236090233e1442ba5206d2aAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services

Award amount

$375,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
CYTEL SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Q8YMW6T664Q5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Binary logistic regression and its extensions to unordered polytocous response, orderedpolytocous response, and Poisson response are among the most popular mathematical models for theanalysis of categorical data with widespread applicability in the biomedical sciences. The usual methodof inference for such models is unconditional maximum likelihood. For large well balanced data sets, orfor data with only a few parameters this approach is satisfactory. However, unconditional maximumlikelihood estimation can produce inconsistent point estimates, inaccurate p-values and inaccurateconfidence intervals for small or imbalanced data sets, and for sets with a large number of parametersrelative to the number of observations. Sometimes the method fails entirely as no estimates can befound which maximize the unconditional likelihood function. A methodologically sound alternativeapproach which as none of the above drawbacks is the exact conditional approach. Here one estimatesthe parameters of interest by computing the exact permutation distributions of their sufficient statistics,conditional on the observed values of the sufficient statistics for the remaining "nuisance" parameters.The major stumbling block to exact permutational inference has always been the heavy computationalburden it imposes. Despite the availability of fast numerical algorithms for the exact computations, therenumerous instances where a data set is tool large to be analyses by the exact methods, yet too sparseor imbalanced for the maximum likelihood approach to be reliable. What is needed is a reliable MonteCarlo alternative to the exact conditional approach which can bridge the gap between the exact andasymptotic methods of inference. The problem is technically hard because conventional Monte Carlomethods lead to massive rejection of samples that do not satisfy the constraints of the conditionaldistribution. We will build a network sampling approach to the Monte Carlo problem that we believe isa major break-through for this difficult but important problem.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

35 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2015). Reported award amounts total $10,481,064. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.