SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of On-Line SSP and ESSP

Award identifier 8ef2032fb9c5053a51d965cefd2a34d5edad9653286f85b2e665aecc820c9868Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$98,734

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
FLYING BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This Phase I proposal seeks funding to develop and conduct feasibility tests of prototype online, web based versions of two existing assessment instruments: the School Success Profile (SSP) and Elementary School Success Profile (ESSP). In addition, two online features of the SSP and ESSP will be tested: online features for reporting results, and a prototype online web-based database of practice resources linked to SSP and ESSP results. The SSP is a scanable, self-report instrument for middle and high school students that assess their perceptions of the social environment, their well-being, and their school performance. The ESSP is a newly developed elementary school version of the SSP that collects data from children (via a computer program), and their parents and teachers (via scan able questionnaires). Both instruments provide school staff with individual and group level profiles designed to inform the intervention process. In Phase I, the online versions of the instruments will be created; existing online profile and report generation systems will be enhanced for both the SSP and ESSP, and the best practice database system will be developed and populated with information on programs, practices, and resources. The online versions and databases will be beta tested. Then, the feasibility and quality of the web-based instruments, reporting mechanisms, and database resources will be examined by: (a) monitoring administration of the instruments to 25 elementary students and their parents and teachers (ESSP), and 25 students at one middle school (SSP), (b) administering brief feedback questionnaires from students (SSP and ESSP), parents (ESSP), and teachers (ESSP), and (c) meeting with the school staff responsible for administering the instruments to collect feedback on the administration and on-line databases. Web-based features will also be used to collect objective data on the administration (e.g., completion times) and database use (e.g., number of pages visited). Data collected on the feasibility and quality of the products will be used to guide revisions to the products. The SSP and ESSP are used in schools to help practitioners understand and develop interventions for children and adolescents to promote their school success and healthy development. The online versions will improve access for practitioners, reduce costs to school systems, speed up the availability of results, and be more consistent with practitioners' day-to-day practice realities. The online instruments will be available to be administered at any time to any number of students. The rapid results and online database resource will help practitioners identify and implement best practice strategies with the students they serve.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.