SBIR/STTR Research Award

CAD-CAM Technology for Diabetic Footwear

Award identifier e7159d101ff071d7b2f72c90082451c138e60077ffbf1f06aa8f7b0d70a62aa0Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$0

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
DIAPEDIA, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
VCA7MUS7HJK3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Over 15% of diabetic patients will experience a foot ulcer. Foot ulcers are expensive both in terms of cost of care and work productivity lost. Foot ulcers are also the dominant contributory cause to the more than 80,000 amputations performed in the US each year in diabetic patients. In order to prevent ulcerations and amputations, at-risk patients must use special footwear for life as part of a comprehensive care and self-care program. Currently the design and manufacture of therapeutic footwear is largely based on subjective criteria. Successful shoes are usually made by experienced craftspeople and much iteration is often required. Several attempts have been made to put the design process for the critical shoe-foot interface (insole) on a quantitative basis. These products appear to have not been particularly successful because of the lack of a well-defined algorithm to translate patient attributes into insole design. We will develop an entire therapeutic shoe system for at risk DM patients that will incorporate: data collection; automatic algorithm for insole design; CAD-CAM system for manufacture; and system for shoe selection including outsole modifications. The final product will also include a means for provider and patient education and products to promote appropriate care and self-care. Phase I preliminary studies have demonstrated success in data acquisition in the areas of plantar pressure, foot shape and arch shape. Algorithms for shoe sizing and alignment of the pressure and shape data with the shoe template have been developed. A method for reproducible design of insole modifications on the computer screen, based on the shape and pressure data, now exists and virtually designed insoles can now be milled using the CAD-CAM system. A data set from patients staying healed has been acquired that for the first time provides guidance for the identification of an in-shoe pressure ulceration threshold. We have also demonstrated feasibility of the whole process by utilizing the method to reduce in-shoe pressure below threshold in a group of neuropathic high-risk feet with high pressure at the first metatarsal head. We now see a clear path toward further automation of the system and to a consideration of other "at-risk" regions of the foot.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

14 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2017). Reported award amounts total $9,092,425. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.