SBIR/STTR Research Award

FEASIBILITY DEMONSTRATION OF A NOVEL CONCEPT TO PROVIDE POSITIVE COMBAT IDENTIFICATION AMONG DIVERSE FRIENDLY FORCES...

Award identifier ca758b9c813b558c561b3d005702a98fce75c4ce5a9427300113c70204e0d810Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Award amount

$239,032

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1993

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Recipient company
Sesco
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

THE RESEARCH EFFORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PHASE I SBIR PROPOSAL, AND ITS POSSIBLE PHASEII FOLLOW-ON, ARE EXPECTED TO EBTABLISH CONCEPTUAL FEASIBILITY AND DEMONSTRATED PRACTICALITY OF A NOVEL CONCEPT FOR PROVIDING POSITIVE COMBAT IDENTIFICATION AMONG DIVERSE FRIENDLY FORCES. THE ASSOCIATED POSTIVE COMBAT IDENTIFICATION DEVICE (PCID) CONCEPT INCORPORATES SESCO PROPRIETARY (PATENT PENDING) SW&RM HARDWARE/SOFTWARE WHICH HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED UNDER AN EARLIER DARPA SPONSORED PROJECT. THE SIX MONTH PHASE I RESEARCH WILL: A) COORDINATE AND DOCUMENT EFFORTS TO FORMULATE A MULTI-SERVICE ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONAL AND DOCTRINAL MERITS OF THE CONCEPT, AND B) ESTABLISH TECHNICAL COMPATIBILITY OF THE CONCEPT AS P(3)I TO EXISTING MILITARY SYSTEMS. THE PHASE I RESEARCH IS EXPECTED TO ESTABLISH SUFFICIENT TECHNICAL/OPERATIONAL/DOCTRINAL MERIT IN THE CONCEPT TO JUSTIFY ADVANCING TO PHASE II (SELECTED HARDWARE DEMONSTRATIONS). DURING THE PROPOSED PHASE I EFFORT, SESCO EXPECTS TO WORK CLOSELY WITH THE SPONSOR AND WITH MANY OF THE FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS: DARPA AND LABCOM - IFF/C(3)I ASPECT DEMONSTRATION INTERESTS; DCSOPS - ARMY DOCTRINAL COMPATIBILITY; USAF/TAC - AIR FORCE DOCTRINAL COMPATIBILITY; TACOM - VETRONICS AND OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY; AVSCOM - AVIONICS AND OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY; FORT HUACHUCA - ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT COMPATIBILITY; ARDEC-WEAPONS/ARTILLERY COMPATIBILITY; USAF/ASD - AVIONICS SYSTEMS COMPATIBILITY; USAF ADTC - WEAPON SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY; SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES; TRI-SERVICE PROJECT C(3)I OFFICE. THE PHASE I RESEARCH PRODUCT WILL BE A REPORT IN THREE PARTS: PART I - COMPATIBILITY OF THE CONCEPT WITH ESTABLISHED OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND DOCTRINE; PART II IFF/AVIONICS/WEAPONS/TROOP COMPATIBILITY; AND PART III - IDENTIFY PHASE II TECHNICAL DEMONSTRATION ISSUES. IF AWARDED, THE TWELVE MONTH PHASE II RESEARCH IS EXPECTED TO PROVIDE SELECTED HARDWARE AND TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE COMPATIBILITY DEMONSTRATIONS OF THE PCID CONCEPT FOR REPRESENTATIVE AVIONICS, VETRONICS, WEAPONS AND TROOP SYSTEMS. IT IS HOPED THAT AN ADDITIONAL PHASE III PROJECT FOR JOINT SERVICE OPERATIONAL AIR/LAND FIELD TRIALS WOULD FOLLOW SUCCESSFUL CONCLUSION OF PHASE I AND II RESEARCH. ANTICIPATED BENEFITS/POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS -

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.