SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of an LPA receptor modulator Rx100 as a radioprotectant

Award identifier 827228fdc2a3d2562446a4f798c425c12a98fef772cd49e8624f4a4173d79c1dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,977

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Rxbio, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DB9LSMAHKNJ8
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Bone marrow and gastrointestinal mucosa are highly sensitive to radiation exposure. Radiation-induced damage to bone marrow and the gastrointestinal tract could be lethal in events such as nuclear accidents or radiation terrorism, depending on radiation doses, exposure rate and quality. No truly satisfactory radioprotective drugs are yet available. The phospholipids growth factor lsophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a prosurvival factor acting via LPA receptors. We have synthes ized a LPA receptor modulator Rx100, a partial agonist for LPA1 and LPA3, and a potent agonist for LAP2 receptor. We have proof of principle that Rx100, when applied either orally or subcutaneously, 1 hr before or 3 hrs after radiation exposure effectively reduced radiation-induced lethality to mice. We propose to fully evaluate Rx100 as a radioprotectant and a radiomitigator. Our ultimate goal is to provide a highly efficient medical countermeasure against radiological and nuclear threats, and a potent rad ioprotectant for cancer patients. Research design: Evaluate the efficacy of Rx100 in ameliorating radiation-associated hematopoietic syndrome. (1) We will use a mouse model of whole-body radiation; (2) We will optimize dosing schedules by oral and subcutan eous routes; (3) We will compare all data to decide two final schedules: one for Rx100 administered prior to radiation exposure as a radioprotectant and one as a radiomitigator; (4) We will quantify Rx100-initiated radioprotection by dose-reduction factor (DRF). Methods: (1) whole-body radiation of mice. Conscious mice are subjected to whole-body irradiation using a Cs-137 source at a rate of 4.6 Gy/min. (2) Hematopoietic assay. The primary endpoint is 30 days overall survival. For determining DRF, mice wil l be subjected to graded lethal doses of radiation exposure to generate survival curves for control groups and Rx100-treated groups. DRF will be calculated by probit analysis. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Exposure to radiation could result in fatal damage to b one marrow and the gut. No truly satisfactory radioprotective drugs are available yet. We propose to develop Rx100 into a highly efficient medical countermeasure against radiological and nuclear threats, and a potent radioprotectant for cancer patients.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2020). Reported award amounts total $1,163,980. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.