SBIR/STTR Research Award

Computational Methods for Feedback Flow Controllers in Aerodynamic Applications

Award identifier ad74478ad488b6d1c31b5b96c1f398d54ef28d5d4fe857fe94a4964a7153db9bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,996

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CLEAR SCIENCE CORP
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CJ8JMGKCJ256
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Clear Science Corp. and the University of California at Los Angeles propose to develop a versatile and comprehensive computational toolbox for designing feedback flow controllers in aerodynamic applications. Target objectives include separation control tomanage lift and form drag, control of transition to turbulence, turbulence control to reduce skin friction drag, increase mixing, or reduce heat transfer, and control of acoustical output (noise suppression). The toolbox will be modular withinterchangeable reduced-order modeling algorithms, system state estimators, and controller designs. We will leverage our team''s work in low-dimensional modeling, balanced order reduction, stochastic estimators, standard controllers for linear systems,and advanced modeling for nonlinear systems. Phase I objectives include demonstrating a prototype of the computational toolbox. The proof-of-concept prototype will target several feedback flow control applications involving different computationaldomains, flow conditions, and control input-output. Reduced-order models, estimators, and controllers will be designed for each application. A second objective is formulation of a Phase II development and test plan. The Phase II plan will includedevelopment of libraries of reduced-order models, estimators, and controllers for feedback flow control. Tests will consist of CFD, controller-in-the-loop simulations to demonstrate modeling and estimation accuracy, controller robustness, and interfacingbetween the computational toolbox and third-party software. The commercial product to be developed is a validated computational toolbox for designing feedback flow controllers in aerospace and industrial applications. The corresponding market includesdesigners of aerospace, automotive, and industrial systems for which flow control is critical. Potential applications of the software include control system designs for low-drag wings on commercial aircraft, low-drag bodies in high-performance automobiles,high-lift blades in rotorcraft, low-distortion jet engine inlets, and high-mixing combustors. Interfaces between the feedback flow control toolbox, commercial CFD codes, and software like Matlab will provide the conduit for commercialization, enablingengineers to incorporate flow control into the overall design process, perform control-in-the-loop simulations, and utilize standard controller designs.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

25 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2017). Reported award amounts total $8,194,415. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.