SBIR/STTR Research Award

DIMETHYLSUBERIMIDATE AS A PULPOTOMY AGENT

Award identifier 8dd162b0a2ba1406f938d44c1bfb1fbe5780a84b29642d02659f90fe2ac9a684Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services

Award amount

$248,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1987

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
BIOMEDICAL DEVELOPMENT CORP
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
CATLLUJNR7W4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

THE LONG-TERM GOAL OF THIS APPLICATION IS TO DEVELOP DIMETHYLSUBERIMIDATE (DMS) AS AN ALTERNATIVE PULP THERAPY. FORMOCRESOL, THE DRUG MOST COMMONLY USED FOR TREATMENT OF CARIOUSLY EXPOSED PULPS OF THE PRIMARY DENTITION, IS TOXIC TO THE TREATED TISSUE, INDUCES ANTIGEN FORMATION AND SUBSEQUENT CHRONIC INFLAMMATION, IS RAPIDLY DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMICALLY, AND HAS MUTAGENIC POTENTIAL. FORMOCRESOL PULPOTOMIZED TEETH ARE OFTEN EXFOLIATED PREMATURELY WITH DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS TO THE DEVELOPING SECONDARY DENTITION. GLUTARALDEHYDE IS USED CLINICALLY AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO FORMOCRESOL, BUT MANY OF THE SAME DANGERS EXIST. DMS IS A DIIMIDOESTER USED AS A CROSS-LINKING AGENT IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND AS AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC FIXATIVE. REAGENT WHICH DOES NOT INTERACT WITH PROTEIN HYDROLYZES SPONTANEOUSLY TO A NONREACTIVE MOLECULE. UNLIKE FORMOCRESOL AND GLUTARALDEHYDE, DMS DOES NOT INDUCE AUTOANTIGEN FORMATION SINCE THERE IS NO NET CHANGE IN CHARGE OF THE PROTEIN AFTER CROSS-LINKING. THIS SUGGESTS THAT DMS IS A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR PULP THERAPY, POTENTIALLY REPLACING FORMOCRESOL OR GLUTARALDEHYDE FOR TEETH PREDESTINED TO EXFOLIATE AND AS A CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT FOR ENDODONTIC INFLAMMATION IN ADULT TEETH. PHASE I RESEARCH WILL DETERMINE THE TOXICITY OF DMS FOR CULTURED ODONTOBLASTS BY EXAMINING CELL VIABILITY AFTER INCUBATION WITH DMS AT VARYING CONCENTRATIONS AND FOR VARYING TIME PERIODS. CELL DAMAGE WILL BE QUANTITATED BY MEASURING ENZYME ACTIVITY IN THE CULTURE MEDIUM. CELL RECOVERY AFTER TREATMENT AND ABILITY OF DMS TO CROSS-LINK PROTEINS WILL BE ASSESSED BY ONE- AND TWO-DIMENSIONAL SDS-PAGE OF CELL PROTEINS, PROTEINS RELEASED INTO THE CULTURE MEDIUM, AND TOTAL PULP PROTEIN BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT. THESE DATA WILL BE USED TO ESTABLISH DOSAGES FOR CLINICAL TRIALS IN PHASE II.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

64 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2025). Reported award amounts total $18,429,764. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.