SBIR/STTR Research Award

Clinical Assessment of a Massed Practice Therapy Device

Award identifier 2bff04a01325aa252531a4eb5179e7b378cc63a21e326a45ca816faf80628f26Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,179,050

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
KINETIC MUSCLES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
HQ3VL9ALJZL9
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This proposal addresses the need expressed in Program Announcement PA-02-071 to utilize innovative technologies to improve the physical and mental function of individuals with disabilities. Many stroke survivors have significant limitations of upper extremity function which have an impact on many important activities such as eating, dressing and personal care. Studies show that to be effective in increasing functional independence, therapy must involve active participation of the patient and repetitive training. However, costs often limit the number of patients that receive this type of therapy. Robotic therapy offers a means of transferring some of this essential, but time consuming, therapy into the home. Phase I of this program demonstrated through laboratory testing and pilot clinical trials the feasibility of this innovative air muscle driven interactive device to provide effective and cost effective therapy. The primary aim of the proposed study is to determine in a randomized, controlled, single blind parallel clinical trial whether the use of this innovative biofeedback technology of Active Repetitive Motion (ARM) therapy in a home environment will increase function and improve the cognitive, emotional, and physical health of people with stroke and in this potentially cost effective manner. One hundred sub-acute (3 to 9 mos post stroke) patients will be randomized to a group that is trained on ARM device therapy and utilize it at home for 3 months or to a group with no ARM therapy. Both groups will receive usual and customary care. Clinical motor function and quality of life measures will compare the groups before intervention, immediatley after, and 3 months later. A subset will be evaluated 1 year later. We hypothesize that the ARM therapy group will improve more than the other group. Time spent using the device and the amount of usual and customary care received by each patient will be recorded, statistically analyzed and comparisons made. The results will provide valuable data on the ability of monitored home therapy to provide effective treatment. This project also has the potential to increase the availability of effective rehabilitation techniques to patients with stroke.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2010). Reported award amounts total $2,328,368. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.