SBIR/STTR Research Award

Materials for Low Cost and Low Erosion Advanced Rocket Propulsion Components

Award identifier 0953f2a824ae29cf1d3c205d3bc2487fd36a5136a8f5b9b0a60d3380c78c998cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$999,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
TRITON SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DA91DUWSMSQ7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Triton Systems, Inc. and our team members propose a Phase II program which will enable revolutionary advances in commercial and US Military Critical rocket propulsion systems, and reduced acquisition and lifetime costs. During the Phase I program, Tritonsuccessfully demonstrated the ability of our novel materials to outperform competing refractory materials, metal or ceramic, composite or monolithic, in terms of combining: Strength at elevated temperatures (10x columbium at 2350F, 20x tungsten at 4000f),Frature toughness (10x silicon carbide), Resistance to oxidation and erosion during liquid and solid rocket motor nozzle/chamber tests, Fullstrength retention at ultimate operating temperatures above 5000F. Manufacturing costs 10% to 250% less than other refractory components, resulting from inexpensive starting materials, near net shape green body machining, and pressureless sintering.During the Phase II program, the Triton team will make the necessary materials and process innovations to elevate this refractory technology to the state of readiness necessary to exploit the promise now being demonstrated for its use in a wide variety ofmilitary and commercial product applications. The additional developments and use-environment specific material improvements will be the critical steps needed to insert Triton's technology into the US and world marketplace. The components we initiallydevelop will enable revolutionary advances in future generations of rocket propulsion systems in terms of reduced acquisiton and lifetime maintenance costs, decreased system weights, and increased performance, impacting kill vehicle (KV) Divert andAttitude Control Systems (DACS), upper stage launch vehicle engines/motors, or commercial satelittle orbit insertion and station keeping motors as we mature the technology base, our development efforts will expand to focus on products which will penetratethe more lucrative commercial ceramic markets. We will leverage our successes in optimizing compositons, processes, and product/materials design methodologies, to insert both commodity and unique products into the $8 Billion per annum market for advancedceramic components.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

927 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2026). Reported award amounts total $388,500,403. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.