SBIR/STTR Research Award

Injectable BMP-2 Formulation for Fracture Healing

Award identifier 5cdf01583dd0af020d9deb1145efc80101a1d7ba5c46cc224d31e565ca6dbaa8Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$204,691

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
AFFINERGY, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YJQ6K1QMS488
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Two recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP's), rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7, are currently used in clinical applications to promote spinal fusion and fracture healing (Mont, Ragland et al. 2004). Over 6.3 million fractures occur each year in the United States alone (Praemer, Furner et al. 1999). Approximately 15% of fractures have delayed or impaired healing. The clinical applications currently in use, however, require open surgery to insert the carrier/BMP combination at the site of healing. There would be considerable clinical benefit from the ability to delivery BMP's via a minimally invasive procedure to accelerate fracture healing or treat delayed or non-unions. In this proposal, we present a novel approach for the development of an injectable delivery system for BMP-2. One major requirement for an injectable carrier for BMP-2 is the maintenance of an appropriate concentration of the osteogenic factor at the site of repair for sufficient time to allow bone-forming progenitor cells to migrate to the site, proliferate, and differentiate. A wide range of carriers have been described and characterized for delivery of BMP-2, however, none of them have a strong intrinsic affinity for BMP-2 sufficient for proper healing via an injectable. In fact, most injectable BMP/carrier combinations that have been explored to date lost 50% or more of the BMP after a few days in vivo (Seeherman, Li et al. 2003). We have identified a series of BMP-2 binding peptides using phage display that have strong affinity for BMP-2. Representative high affinity BMP-2 binding peptides will be chemically crosslinked to type I collagen to generate an injectable carrier that binds and retains BMP-2. These binding peptides will then be investigated for their ability to sustain the release of BMP-2 from a collagen matrix, while maintaining the growth factors bioactivity and improving its ability to promote bone formation in vivo. The development of this type of delivery matrix, which uses peptides with differing affinities for BMP, may allow for a greater degree of control of the release of BMP from the matrix, faster healing times, and enable new clinical treatments with BMP. Most importantly, the development of an injectable BMP-2 formulation would allow for the treatment of fractures with a minimally invasive procedure.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

75 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2023). Reported award amounts total $59,804,968. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.