SBIR/STTR Research Award

Immunogenic epitopes of rare HIV mutants as vaccines

Award identifier 0b1f42fb6b873f3a692d64bf8c832459eb8606106e60d9301f26623e454c36a0Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$600,002

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Mixture Sciences, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): A very large number of HIV mutants have been recorded in the Los Alamos HIV Molecular Immunology Database. Interestingly, common mutations, i.e., found in 30-40% of viral isolates, represent few different sequences, while numerous different rare mutations are found only in single or very few individuals. One interpretation of these facts may be that the common mutants represent weak immunogenic sequence variations that have most successfully evaded the selective pressure of CTL recognition, and that more immunogenic rare mutants have not. Furthermore, the principal basis for enhanced immunogenicity of the rarer CTL epitope mutants may be their increased content of non-conservative amino acid substitutions. We propose to explore the hypothesis that the rarer mutant CTL epitopes of HIV are more immunogenic than the common ones, and to establish the proof-of-principal that they may be more effective as vaccines in generating anti-HIV CTL responses. To validate this approach we have selected three HLA-A2 restricted epitopes [Gag p17 77-85; Gag p24 19-27; RT 309-317] since the cellular immune responses to HLA-A2 CTL epitopes are by far the most well studied and the HLA-A2 superfamily has been associated with natural resistance to infection. In a first step, we will synthesize all mutants listed in the Los Alamos Database for these three epitopes (a total of 107 individual peptides). Immunogenicity will be assessed in Aim 2 using HLA-A2 transgenic mouse model. Thus, animals will be immunized, CTL lines generated, and the avidity of these lines will be assessed (1) by ELISpot on: immunizing peptide, the native ligand, and/or common mutants; (2) by intracellular staining for the responding cells; and (3) on T2 target cells pulsed with the priming peptide, the native ligand, and common mutants. The essence of these studies is to demonstrate that these peptide mutants are able to generate specific CTLs that recognize the immunizing peptide, but more importantly, they also recognize the corresponding natural HIV-1 epitope and common mutants. Finally, the breadth of CTL responses induced by a "cocktail" mixture of the most immunogenic peptide mutants identified will be determined using the same model system (Aim 3). Following the proposed proof-of-principle studies, we anticipate having available a series of peptide candidates for toxicity and efficacy in phase I/II clinical trials as part of a phase II SBIR effort. In addition, phase II will include the identification of multiple other CTL epitope mutants for A2 and other common MHC class I haplotypes for the design of a more complete vaccine covering multiple HIV epitopes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.