SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of negative allosteric modulators of the mu-opioid receptor for the management of opioid use disorder

Award identifier 6770d09c922aadfcb09c6f5402b239c91dc35088bf0f81b029534df9866b8e8dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$3,012,228

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ELEVEN THERAPEUTICS CORP
Proposal award date
2024-09-30
Contract end date
2026-08-31
UEI
E1W7Z1DEAH23
Solicitation number
PA23-232
Topic code
NIDA

Research abstract

Abstract There is a significant need for new treatments to manage the multitude of patients suffering from opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine and methadone are both effective medications for OUD but are agonists with potential for abuse and diversion, and with methadone the risk of respiratory depression and overdose death. Moreover, these compounds are not effective in relapse situations. The antagonist naltrexone is an alternative that does prevent relapse but has poor patient compliance due to its complete blockade of the mu-opioid system. We have discovered compounds that act as non-competitive antagonists of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR). These compounds interact with a novel site on the receptor to function as allosteric antagonists, also called NAMs or Negative Allosteric Modulators. They reduce the activity of MOR agonists in a fashion that is non-surmountable and that does not completely shut down the receptor, thereby providing the ability to reduce opioid actions in individuals with OUD, potentially without inducing withdrawal and lacking the negative side-effects of current agonist or antagonist treatments. Our hypothesis is that NAMs of MOR (MOR-NAMs) could be developed as effective non- agonist treatments for OUD by targeting MOR in a novel way leading to our goal of identifying proprietary MOR-NAMs as an improved, non-agonist treatment for OUD. In Phase 1 of this STTR application (R41, DA056254) we identified several proprietary MOR-NAM’s with high potency at MOR, that are active in vitro, block actions of morphine in mice and are orally bioavailable. The objective of the Phase 2 application is to develop these NAM molecules into druggable compounds with favorable DMPK characteristics, no obvious toxicity or off-target liabilities, a complete lack of any MOR agonist activity and that inhibit fentanyl seeking behavior in rat self-administration models. At the end of this Phase 2 work, we expect to be in a very favorable position to seek strategic partnerships to fund large-scale chemical synthesis and in vivo toxicology as we towards an IND application and eventual clinical trials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2024). Reported award amounts total $3,332,228. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.