SBIR/STTR Research Award

Measuring Whole and Tissue Level Bone Strength in men

Award identifier 504443dc2202976522fd4fea32728cd0d911628fd8739f8e5a5b84d70e1ff216Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$2,871,695

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ACTIVE LIFE SCIENTIFIC INC
Proposal award date
2024-09-25
Contract end date
2026-05-31
UEI
JMU9QSMGB676
Solicitation number
PA22-176
Topic code
NIA

Research abstract

Abstract Most patients who fracture have non-osteoporotic bone mineral density. Often, the result of a fracture is devastating and results in substantial morbidity and health care costs. One cause of fragility in these patients is poor bone quality that subsequently contributes to higher risk for fracture. Yet few techniques are available to accurately assess bone quality in the clinic. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most used clinical surrogate for fracture risk, but DXA does not account for bone quality and thus overestimates bone health. OsteoProbe® Reference Point Indenter enables the measurement of bone quality in human patients and has been used safely on over 7,000 individuals. The OsteoProbe® quantifies bone material quality as a measure termed bone material strength index (BMSi). Measurements are made in a routine exam on the midshaft of the tibia by a safe and rapid microindentation process. A significant and predictive relationship has been demonstrated between tibial BMSi and fracture occurrence at multiple skeletal sites in published studies and in our Phase II study. Since fragility fractures occur most often at the hip, wrist, and the spine, this renewal will allow us to confirm the predictive relationship between OsteoProbe measurements at the tibia and bone strength at these clinically relevant skeletal sites on male cadavers. As in our original Phase II, we hypothesize that tibial OsteoProbe® measurements will predict bone strength at the whole bone and tissue levels at the hip, wrist, and spine for both males and females. At each of these skeletal sites, OsteoProbe measurements, BMD, and whole bone and tissue level mechanical testing will be performed. The renewal proposal aims to: (1) establish and confirm the mechanistic basis by which a clinically relevant surrogate of in vivo bone strength could be accurately measured at the hip, wrist, and spine for males; (2) develop OsteoProbe into a more manufacturable device that can be produced and supported in volume; and (3) provide pivotal data for an FDA 510(k) approval of a new, commercially attractive, and reimbursable marketing claim for OsteoProbe.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2024). Reported award amounts total $5,401,823. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.