SBIR/STTR Research Award

Modular Radiation Shielding for Transportation and Use of Microreactors

Award identifier 032a1096f1baa5c5c18b97add12559738801f0b236d71a94fea0bcd3a532f417Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
CPS TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Proposal award date
2024-09-10
Contract end date
2026-09-09
UEI
JT8NDLFDXHY1
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003279
Topic code
C56-40e

Research abstract

Nuclear microreactors producing < 20 MW of power are being researched for portable and on-site energy production in situations such as disaster relief, mobile encampments, or remote locations where access to the regional power grid is limited or difficult. In order to facilitate mass production of nuclear reactors, reliable, replaceable, and lightweight radiation shielding must be produced for both transportation and improved maintenance procedures. Modular composite shielding is ideal for this situation, allowing for simple mass-production and assembly. The need for simplified shielding can be solved by creating a novel lightweight composite material to be used as a radiation absorber for all relevant radiation types. Proposed aluminum-based metal matrix composites contain tungsten and boron-carbide reinforcement for both gamma and neutron absorbing capabilities respectfully. In Phase I, metal matrix composite shielding consisting of an aluminum matrix reinforced with both tungsten and boron carbide was developed. Manufacturing processes were established, and the resulting composites were shown to be effective at both neutron and gamma radiation shielding. Neutron shielding performance was similar to other aluminum-boron carbide composites on the market, while gamma shielding results far surpassed typically used materials while reducing mass by over 50%. In Phase II, composite compositions will be further optimized to maximize shielding performance while driving down mass. Manufacturing processes will be scaled to fabricate demonstrator components as large as 48ö x 36ö in area. Continued radiation, mechanical, and thermal testing will be performed to generate material property databases. Developing light weight composite microreactor shielding materials will enable the proliferation of reliable, low-cost nuclear energy production. The modular composites will be cheaper to produce than custom designs, and easier to replace if damaged or during regular maintenance. Furthermore, the production process will lend itself to rapid development of additional composites using novel radiation absorbers. Additional commercial potential includes replacing commonly used shielding in both the space and medical radiation shielding markets.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2025). Reported award amounts total $5,524,990. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.