SBIR/STTR Research Award

Thermal Battery Powerplant for CRAW Torpedo Propulsion

Award identifier 732e37ba0bcab2d6e214007e91a9694508b119c089fa4e942099266340e59926Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$139,969

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2024-08-28
Contract end date
2025-02-24
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
24.1
Topic code
N241-042

Research abstract

The Compact Rapid Attack Weapon (CRAW) is a very lightweight multi-mission torpedo with a 6.75” diameter that is launched out of a countermeasure tube. Its mission is to neutralize offensive weapons with the highest kill probability which is commonly achieved through maximum speed and maneuverability, that in turn, is achievable with increased power density.  Numerous researchers have shown that thermal battery technology offers maximum possible battery-based power density by both volume and weight, although the maximum run time remains a challenge. At room temperature the thermal battery is inert allowing it to be safely handled and stored for over 20 years in a submarine environment before use.  CFD Research thermal battery technology consists of a proprietary cathode, electrolyte, anode and pyrotechnic energy source that give it superior power density to lithium-ion and most other energy storage methods under consideration for the CRAW system.  In this SBIR, CFD Research proposes to design an afterbody for the CRAW based on its thermal battery technology. The Phase I analytical efforts include: Thermal battery definition capable of sourcing over 100 HP at >600Vdc; Electric motor definition capable of continuous 100 HP for up to 10 minutes; Small form factor battery/motor controller and associated system containment definition within a 6” diameter by 38” in length weighing less than 67 pounds; Assurance that all Naval abuse and safety standards are exceeded. The Phase I option will include development of conceptual and detailed design specifications and capabilities to be implemented within the Phase II prototype deliverable.  One or more prototype 100 HP electric powerplant systems configured to CRAW architecture will be delivered upon conclusion of Phase II for independent Navy test and evaluation at Penn State University’s Applied Research Lab.  During Phase III CFD Research will team with Raytheon and Aerojet to transition this technology into a low-rate initial production phase in a similar fashion to past DoD-sponsored missile system motor demonstration efforts.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.