SBIR/STTR Research Award

Flexible, High-Cadence, Low-Cost, Hypersonic Launch Platform

Award identifier 10da90ec13da706dc582be05e488076131c74558a24298694457ec509f43fcdbAwarding agency Department of Defense · Space Development Agency

Award amount

$1,249,990

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Space Development Agency
Recipient company
Fenix Space, Inc.
Proposal award date
2024-08-27
Contract end date
2025-05-27
UEI
G4EFVFE8EY68
Solicitation number
24.4
Topic code
SDA24-P001

Research abstract

SDA's Tracking Layer currently has limited opportunities to test tracking constellation capabilities using hypersonic targets flying real mission scenarios. There are only a handful of such flight tests each year and even fewer actual threat flights to observe. Providing an advantage to the US warfighter requires SDA assets to track launches and predict trajectories that include a wide array of threat types. These threats fly vastly difference trajectories, propulsion systems and thermal protection systems, each presenting a different thermal radiance spectra and intensity that varies with time. Fenix Space, Inc. proposes a launch platform in an innovative architecture that provides a high-cadence, low-cost hypersonic target capability with the flexibility to fly: (a) trajectories with widely varying speeds, altitudes, and flight paths; (b) different propulsion types including cryogenic O2/CH4, liquid oxygen/kerosene, storable liquid combinations, hybrid and solid propellants; and (c) various thermal protection systems. Additionally, hypersonic flight targets can be tested with an array of other subsystems, such as alternate telemetry, on board. The Fenix Space, Inc. target flights serve as "training missions" for SDA Tracking Layer assets, exercising sensors arrays, data processing, in-space communications systems and space-to-ground communications. Fenix proposes a launch platform for hypersonic testing that flies tests at cadences up to one per day, if desired, at costs of 1/100 to 1/20 current flight test methods. SDA assets also have the potential to provide hypersonic flight test range services at much lower cost than the current solution of arraying USN ships all along the flight path. The Fenix Space, Inc. hypersonic flight test solution is an air tow launch platform that is very agile, able to operate out of existing airfield infrastructure rather than dedicated ground launch sites. The combination of SDA orbital tracking and telemetry capabilities with the Fenix flexible, agile hypersonic flight test capability is synergistic in that tests can be flown in locations previously too challenging to consider, and at the desired cadence, a critical DoD need.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2024). Reported award amounts total $1,524,986. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.