SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of Tunable, Repeatable, Calcium Lanthanum Sulfide Ceramic Powder, Phase II

Award identifier bc50100bd15c1fc1c11597405c7d894e52f3bcbd132ab0522ff07f47e3fbe724Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$992,974

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Lorad Chemical Corporation
Proposal award date
2024-08-06
Contract end date
2026-08-03
UEI
LBGZEX6KUZN4
Solicitation number
22.2
Topic code
N222-116

Research abstract

Lorad Chemical Corporation (ōLoradö) has composed this Phase II full proposal to build off our successes in Phase I and expand our understanding of the Calcium Lanthanum Sulfide (ōCLSö) synthesis to achieve a material that is optimized for densification into infrared transmitting ceramic parts. Lorad has developed nano-scale high purity CLS powders suitable for fabrication of near theoretical density infrared transparent domes/windows and multi-lens applications. CLS incorporated into domes/windows has several applications in infrared (IR) optical systems and IR lenses for sensors, imaging devices, and laser applications. In Phase I of our program, LoradÆs aim was to demonstrate that we could synthesize independent, consistent, repeatable lots of CLS with a tunable non-stoichiometric 90:10 Lanthanum Sulfide to Calcium Sulfide composition. Not only did Lorad achieve this goal, but we were also able to begin addressing a secondary issue with CLS, which is the persistent trace Oxygen and Carbon contamination in the synthesis. Through LoradÆs efforts in Phase I, we were able to greatly reduce the level of Carbon to undetectable levels and made significant inroads in reducing the Oxygen. Our Phase I efforts also led us to learn critical details about the powder morphology and how that relates to the infrared transmission of resultant ceramic parts. During Phase II, Lorad plans to use the information gained from our Phase I program to direct our course of actionŚwe will focus on eliminating any remaining traces of Oxygen and Carbon from the synthesis by modifying conditions of the sulfidation step of the process, we will focus on achieving a rounded particle morphology for the final powder either through post-process milling or a fluidized bed reactor, we will work on further narrowing the particle size distribution to achieve greater uniformity of the pressed ceramic parts, and we will work to further optimize the precursor powder processing so that we can scale-up the batch size of the material. With our greater understanding of CLS obtained through our Phase I program efforts, we are confident that we will achieve production of a powder with the desired characteristics necessary to produce a highly transmissible, densified ceramic part.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2024). Reported award amounts total $1,219,991. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.