SBIR/STTR Research Award

EEG Signature Analysis for Drug Repurposing for Rare Diseases

Award identifier 74fec65a3bd9182f8f93a99f213dca0033162fb075d651540f20ad9366e6320cAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,020,875

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
PsychoGenics Inc.
Proposal award date
2024-08-05
Contract end date
2026-07-31
UEI
YXMNA8N7LFG4
Solicitation number
PA23-230
Topic code
101

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY The high rate of failure in CNS drug discovery, in particular of the first-in-class therapeutics with new modes of action, highlights a clear unmet need to improve the success rate in drug discovery for rare diseases and psychiatric disorders. One well-known issue is the high cost, high risk, and low development time for drug development, time, and costs that most of the 10,000 rare disorder patients and support organizations cannot afford to support or wait for. Another important issue is the lack of clear targets for many for most rare diseases, which are complex and may require polypharmacology. Phenotypic screening platforms are well-suited for drug repurposing of drug in a target-agnostic manner. Suitable proven in vivo phenotypic screens, however, are scarce with the exception of PsychoGenics SmartCube® platform, which has been developed in the past few years for drug repurposing approaches using behavioral data, combining reference drugs’ signatures, and comparing them against disease animal models’ signatures. Our aim for this Fast Track project is to create a similar repurposing platform based on EEG data, using our eCube® fast EEG platform. To do this we will assess in eCube® several animal models of rare disease to create a small database, increase our reference drug EEG database, and use a novel algorithm, called Drug EEG Signature Analysis (DESA) to compare the two datasets and generate at once a multitude of hypotheses for potential drug repurposing. These hypotheses to be evaluated empirically using such models of disease. If our Phase I proof of concept project is successful, we will use the Phase II period to get the platform ready for commercialization. If successful, this platform will be an innovative and unique drug repurposing platform, offered as fee-for-service or used in drug development by PGI and its partners.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2025). Reported award amounts total $14,097,788. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Contractor profile

PSYCHOGENICS INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.