SBIR/STTR Research Award

ROBUST AND PRECISE LIQUID AND SUPERCRITICAL FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT

Award identifier ac49a2756ea40aea3bd13b9b18a0fd3c5c93dc17d52cae30da643767e60c11dcAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,249,955

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
2024-07-31
Contract end date
2026-11-02
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
23.1
Topic code
AF231-0002

Research abstract

Aerodynamic and Propulsion Test Unit (APTU) ground testing of high speed/hypersonic vehicles requires support infrastructure to supply fuels at supercritical pressures and temperatures at or in excess of those experienced during flight.  When this aspect is combined with the necessity of pre-heating the hydrocarbon fuel to mimic fuel cooling operations of flight vehicle component hardware a novel flow measurement method is required.  The unknown thermodynamic nature of the hydrocarbon fuel entering the ramjet/scramjet configuration presents a significant challenge to precisely quantifying the amount combustible flow entering the engine.  State-of-the-art Coriolis flow measurement devices will be combined with instantaneous measurement and monitoring compensation for this heating and ensuing altered transport properties to provide precise and instantaneous fuel mass flow rate measurements downstream of the APTU Heated Fuel System (HFS).  Partnership with Emerson, combined with precise analytical and experimental fuel property calibration correction protocols, will permit implementation of commercial grade Coriolis measurement systems by contract end.  Existing CFD Research APTU test operational understanding will be leveraged to efficiently integrate and deliver two prototype Emerson hydrocarbon mass flow rate measurement systems robustly operational up to 800°F flow inlet temperature nine months after award.  These meters will be available for immediate calibration and/or implementation by the AFTC Hypersonic Systems and/or the AFRL/RQT Endothermic Fuels Test Branches.  Ongoing meter functional testing by both of these Air Force organizations and CFD Research will be focused on integration checkout and meter performance quantification (measurement uncertainty assessment, multiphase/decomposition quantification, necessary active cooling methods, etc.).  These efforts will culminate in the final delivery of two additional meters, the first operational up to 1000°F flow inlet temperature and the second operational up to 1200°F flow inlet temperature, with precise calibration documentation pertaining to accuracy, uncertainty, response time, etc.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.