SBIR/STTR Research Award

C58 29 bb Overcoming Barriers for Reuseable Ground to Orbit Thermal Nuclear Rocketry

Award identifier d61cf0b1a4ebf291332ac4cdde3aa95187b460c593eaa5832d48c02bfdc3806dAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
CUBECAB CO
Proposal award date
2024-07-22
Contract end date
2025-01-21
UEI
LT7LPKPSH8A4
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003202
Topic code
C58-29bb

Research abstract

The problem to be addressed is the high cost of getting to space. Despite the famous advances of a certain notable private launch company, the cost of launching anything into orbit remains the dominant cost for nearly any use of space. Dropping the cost much further will require going beyond chemical rockets, revisiting an old technology that was not feasible when first investigated but for which the components have now been developed: thermal nuclear rockets for transportation from ground to orbit. If an architecture that is both safe and economical can be established, and the technology licensed to American rocket companies, this would set the stage for much greater exploitation of space by non-government, civil government, and military users alike, enhancing current uses and enabling many more. The proposal is to study architectures that have become feasible, for a fully reusable thermal nuclear rocket that sheds no radioactive material at any point, save for replacing the nuclear element on the ground when not in operation. The study will focus on aspects of a proposed future scenario: a hypothetical launch provider developing a small, fully reusable thermal nuclear launch vehicle, requiring little more between most flights than replacing propellant, amortizing its costs across hundreds of launches per year. Safety and requirements for regulatory approval ľ which largely go hand in hand ľ will be primary concerns. This proposal will update miniature nuclear thermal rocket designs previously invested in by our country, primarily by giving a new mission more suited to their price and performance profile to make them economically feasible. This phase of the project will primarily be modeling and simulation, to lay the grounds for a future phase that may construct a physical prototype including nuclear material. Technical performance will be modeled: unlike existing nuclear rockets that are for use in space only, this design must have a much higher thrust in relation to its mass. As part of modeling this, exposure to radioactivity at various distances and under various conditions will be estimated, in comparison to existing standards for maximum safe levels of exposure to establish measures such as the minimum distance it must be from any member of the public upon reaching criticality.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2024). Reported award amounts total $249,886. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.