SBIR/STTR Research Award

Functionalized 3D Carbon Nanofiber Composites for High-Performance Autonomous Aerial Vehicles

Award identifier 47a70f46a0c7bc2f5f4dc0180bc4ec344a1ccfcab9ed2ba80f62e8c4cbd14e86Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ARK POWER TECH CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2024-07-22
Contract end date
2025-07-21
UEI
RYV4H7MZQG46
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003202
Topic code
C58-22d

Research abstract

ARK Power Technology is collaborating with POSCO and other specialty material suppliers to advance development of versatile carbon nanofiber (CNF) materials for electrified transportation applications, with a focus on autonomous aerial vehicles (AAVs). CNF Electrodes for Lithium-Sulfur Cells: Our initiative involves the production of lightweight CNF cathode and anode substrates, utilizing functionalized carbon nanofibers. These advancements facilitate the construction of high-performance lithium-sulfur (Li-S) cells. The superior conductivity of CNF electrodes allows for the elimination of metal foils, significantly reducing battery weight and enabling the development of solid-state Li-S batteries. While lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) possess a theoretical gravimetric energy density of approximately 800 Wh/kg, Li-S batteries offer a markedly higher value of approaching 2,600 Wh/kg. Our non-optimized laboratory cells have already achieved approximately 500 Wh/kg, indicating a potential reduction in mass for energy storage by approximately 50% compared to LIBs. Li-S batteries also offer enhanced safety features, are more environmentally friendly, and obviate the need for critical energy materials such as cobalt, nickel, manganese, and natural graphite, all at a substantially lower cost. CNF Flexible and Adaptive Battery Modules: We propose developing interchangeable CNF-based cell packaging solutions that can be seamlessly integrated within AAVĺs power distribution. This approach optimizes space utilization, weight distribution, and ensures ruggedized, durable circuit formation. The moldable nature of CNF, which possesses approximately half the density of aluminum and offers adjustable directional strength, enables a reduction of up to 50% in mass related to battery housing. Furthermore, the integration of sensors into CNF materials used as structural components enhances vehicle optimization. The inherent flexibility of CNF composites allows for real-time adjustments of mechanical elements and electrical distribution pathways, leading to improved performance. The insights garnered through adhering to stringent aerospace engineering standards for AAVs will expedite advancements in the autonomous electric vehicle sector.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2024). Reported award amounts total $346,497. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.