SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries with High Energy Density

Award identifier dfd472b4f2c9765dc58b7bb286f215f3c95c0b9520330464fe3732aa62c5b6e9Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,728

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
UNIGRID INC.
Proposal award date
2024-07-22
Contract end date
2025-07-21
UEI
P4EQW98TF1F4
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003202
Topic code
C58-22a

Research abstract

For this SBIR Phase I project, the applicant will develop an advanced sodium-ion battery with high energy density for electric vehicle applications. Current state-of-the-art lithium-ion batteries have good performance but remain too costly and too prone to fires for widespread, mass-market adoption for electric vehicles. In recent years, lithium-ion batteries using a lithium iron phosphate cathode have emerged as the dominant technology for electric vehicles. While they offer lower cost, improved safety and excellent cyclability, their energy density is limited and cost needs to further come down for electric vehicles to be widely adopted. To this end, sodium-ion batteries are generally regarded as the next technology on the horizon. In this context, the applicant aims at developing an advanced sodium-ion battery. While conventional sodium-ion has lower energy density than lithium iron phosphate, the applicantĺs proposed sodium-ion battery directly addresses the energy density shortcoming (by using a combination of a tin-based anode and a layered oxide cathode), and further reduces cost by avoiding the use of lithium (instead using abundant sodium) and copper (instead using aluminum). This results in the advanced sodium-ion chemistry having a cell-level cost of $65/kWh at scale compared to the $90/kWh of lithium-ion iron phosphate. In addition, it has improved safety (it can be safely transported at 0 V), has superior energy density (>400 Wh/L) compared to lithium iron phosphate (300-350 Wh/L) with a similar form factor (18650 cylindrical), and can operate over a wider temperature range (-40 to 60°C). A schematic of a conventional sodium-ion battery and the advanced sodium-ion battery is provided below in Figure 1. Figure 1. Schematic of a conventional sodium-ion battery (left) and the advanced tin-based sodium-ion battery (center). Right: Prototype, first-generation sodium-ion 18650 cylindrical cells produced by the applicant. During Phase I, the applicant will (1) develop the new, advanced sodium-ion cell chemistry, (2) conduct cell optimization, and (3) scale up the chemistry to the cylindrical form factor with a minimum capacity of 1Ah. Cylindrical cells are a commonly used form factor for electric vehicles, and this project will thus serve as a vital feasibility study and development milestone for future scaling efforts and eventual deployment. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Provided that the project milestones are hit and the 1Ah cylindrical cell is demonstrated (produced using the exact same manufacturing processes as lithium-ion without any new or custom equipment), this will de-risk the technology and pave the way for future commercialization of the advanced sodium-ion technology. The battery makes up approximately 40% of the cost of an electric vehicle, so the cost to produce the electric vehicle can be brought down dramatically with the advent of this new, safer, high-performance technology.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2024). Reported award amounts total $1,434,421. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.