SBIR/STTR Research Award

Windowless Alpha/Beta Detector

Award identifier 72c2fd7334b0b0174c9027b1dffb16bfc1b42ade80d574b9f1d2042a380e8087Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Award amount

$1,092,722

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Recipient company
CORVID TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2024-07-15
Contract end date
2026-07-14
UEI
DD7KTEMDG6A5
Solicitation number
19.2
Topic code
DTRA192-006

Research abstract

Alpha/beta detectors suffer frequent service disruptions as a result of punctures or damage to the fragile aluminized Mylar window common to the detectors on the market today. Both military and commercial users would greatly benefit from having a more durable instrument for alpha/beta radiation detection. To address this deficiency, Corvid Technologies has developed a novel protective layer that replaces the fragile window with a very thin composite layer that permits the detection of alpha/beta particles and is completely opaque to ambient light. In prior DTRA Phase I and Phase II SBIR programs, Corvid developed the ruggedized scintillator and successfully demonstrated its use as part of a custom built, handheld alpha/beta detector. A brassboard prototype of Corvid’s alpha/beta detector was constructed using a custom light guide and silicon photomultipliers instead of photomultiplier tubes, which significantly reduced the size, weight, and power required for operation compared to conventional alpha/beta detectors. Corvid is proposing a second Phase II effort that is aimed at enhancing the performance of our ruggedized alpha/beta scintillator. Our main objective for this effort is to refine our fabrication process in order to produce scintillators that match or exceed the performance when installed in commercially available, conventional windowed alpha/beta detectors. We can improve the performance of our ruggedized scintillator through the completion of three technical objectives. The first objective is to increase alpha detection efficiency by reducing the thickness of our protective layer while maintaining its opacity to ambient light. The second objective focuses on increasing alpha scintillation luminosity by exploring better light-reflecting layers to redirect the light produced within the scintillator more effectively. The third objective is to develop quality controls for large scale production to prepare for commercial integration of this technology. These design improvements will ensure that Corvid’s ruggedized scintillator will perform as well as windowed scintillators when used as a replacement on commercial alpha/beta detectors.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

226 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2025). Reported award amounts total $135,094,490. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.