SBIR/STTR Research Award

Contingency Analysis for Low-thrust Missions (CALM)

Award identifier 3b6cc7201c97720dc575461c0aa8506c2c2cba9a642c4ed472a61a1110c182d1Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$899,984

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ADVANCED SPACE LLC
Proposal award date
2024-06-07
Contract end date
2026-06-06
UEI
EFK8T9QULJM9
Solicitation number
SBIR_23_P2
Topic code
H9

Research abstract

Low-thrust spacecraft trajectory optimization consists of defining a nominal solution that obeys known constraints and minimizes the spacecraft propellant mass used. A major deficiency with these traditional methods is that it is difficult to incorporate missed thrust events, spacecraft failure modes, or other mission-specific anomalies in the mission planning phase. Such anomalies could include the spacecraft going into safe mode, missing a tracking pass from Earth, or experiencing an off-nominal operational state such as using the wrong thrusting power mode or a thruster firing malfunction. Experienced engineers use intuition and guesswork to arrive at solutions manually that are robust to failure modes, but this ad-hoc approach typically comes at the expense of the time it takes for trajectory optimization. There is currently no industry standard to account for anomalous activities or failure modes for low-thrust and dynamically sensitive missions. This solution aims to address this specific deficiency in the mission planning process. The proposed solution is named CALM or Contingency Analysis for Low-thrust Missions.nbsp; In response to the 2023 NASA SBIR Phase II solicitation subtopic H9.03, ldquo;Flight Dynamics and Navigation Technologies,rdquo; Advanced Space, LLC proposes to develop a mission design and planning tool that uses operational algorithms to mitigate the impact of anomalies and missed thrust events for low-thrust and dynamically sensitive missions. The software tool is an extension of the Virtual Swarm Method (VSM) for low-thrust trajectory optimization to maximize the missed-thrust recovery margin. The tool will be used to generate a multitude of spacecraft trajectories simultaneously to determine the worst-case scenarios to account for margins in the mission design. The results will provide trajectories and thrust arcs from failure modes, inform mass and propellant margins, and contribute to mission risk analysis and mitigation.nbsp;

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

30 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2025). Reported award amounts total $13,857,121. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense

Contractor profile

ADVANCED SPACE LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.