SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enhanced Gene Therapy Delivery Through Electric Pulsing Double-Balloon Catheter

Award identifier 02b8d1ed639c3fa32ffed7e1d03d5342c439d192f351e068873f9241021fbe56Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$331,034

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
VECTOR SURGICAL LLC
Proposal award date
2024-01-15
Contract end date
2025-01-14
UEI
H21JE6C73181
Solicitation number
PA22-176
Topic code
100

Research abstract

Project Summary We propose to develop the novel Gene Therapy Catheter (GTC), an electrical pulsing (EP) device designed to deliver adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy to the liver, increasing the efficiency of the viral vector to achieve safer, more affordable, therapeutic outcomes. Liver-directed gene therapies show great promise for the treatment of monogenic diseases due to the liver’s central role in metabolism. AAV has emerged as the leading vector for in vivo liver-directed gene therapy treatment with more than 24 US clinical studies using AAV completed or ongoing. However, to reach therapeutic effect, these treatments are often delivered systemically with high vector dosages, which can trigger lethal immune responses and are prohibitively expensive. This Phase I SBIR grant will explore an innovative approach to liver- directed gene therapy that, if successful, could unlock the potential for curing a multitude of monogenic liver diseases. The GTC is designed to safely increase the efficiency of AAV gene therapy to the liver. The GTC combines local delivery with an electrode for EP and double balloons to isolate local tissue from circulation, enabling the tissue to be flushed of preformed neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). The GTC features a novel combination of elements to increase AAV hepatocyte transduction while avoiding vector-mediated immunotoxicity. We hypothesize that the GTC will: a) enable these therapies to achieve clinical benefit using <10% of the current range of AAV dose relative to systemic administration; and b) reduce the risk of adverse events caused by high systemic doses.1 Proving feasibility of the GTC’s EP enhanced transduction of hepatocytes in a large animal model is the most compelling element of this work. Preliminary data justify building the GTC prototype in Aim 1, optimizing electric field parameters in Aim 2, and demonstrating safety and effectiveness in vivo in Aim 3. Phase II research, if awarded, will focus on developing the technology toward Phase III commercialization, including refining the EP parameters and functionality of the double balloons, leading to a fundamental advancement of care for many patients in need of gene therapy. 1 The 40x increase in transduction seen in vitro (see Preliminary Research) equates to a 97.5% decrease in vector requirement. We theorize that 40x understates the true effect due to: a) multiplicity of infection at high dosage; and b) and not having reached the dilution point where +EP and -EP groups achieve the same outcome.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.