SBIR/STTR Research Award

Machine Learning Database to Guide Development of Low Flammability Polymer Matrix Composites

Award identifier a1f20bbaba719f9ae449f6ee49dae126e8831593e26ba816a5ada03e67e35724Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Global Engineering and Materials, Inc.
Proposal award date
2023-12-04
Contract end date
2025-03-15
UEI
FDL9AWUAMKL1
Solicitation number
23.2
Topic code
N232-106

Research abstract

The NAVY seeks an active machine learning database to guide the development of polymer matrix resins and composites that meet metrics for time to ignition, maximum heat release rate, and smoke density from a cone calorimeter. The current fire evaluation and certification of composite materials to be used for naval vessels are heavily reliant on tests such as cone calorimeter and TGA tests. Due to the strong thermo-chemo-mechanical interactions on material fire behavior, there is no reliable physics-driven relation between the chemical structure of a resin / additives and the fire performance of its associated composite materials. The presence of limited test data and the high cost in generation of material test data have prevented the development of a machine learning (ML) model to predict the flammability index parameters of a given resin for use in optimizing the design and selection of a resin to achieve the desired fire requirements. To address these challenges and bridge the existing technology gap, Global Engineering and Materials, Inc. (GEM) and its team members proposed to develop a multiscale machine learning (ML) database and a data-driven platform to predict the flammability index parameters for polymer matrix resins from their chemical structures. In this database framework, physics-based digital twins, data-driven models, and machine learning models are combined to generate a machine learning database that relates the chemical structure to the cone calorimeter data. Actual data from the literature will be augmented with synthetic data generated from a digital twin of a cone calorimeter with input based on the chemical structure and a data-driven model. A machine learning model will then be developed to accelerate the discovery of new polymer systems to more rapidly expand the database and allow for inverse design of polymers based on desired flammability index parameters. In Phase I, the research team will demonstrate the capability of the developed ML database using existing test data, generated synthetic data, and new polymer data to predict fire performance based on chemical structure and inverse design for identifying chemical structure based on desired fire performance.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

69 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2026). Reported award amounts total $29,673,382. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.