SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel therapy for arthrofibrosis

Award identifier 8b67728a8a963b7f567453648310133c1fd39bf3098222ffaf1cc1f5cdefb31aAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$275,765

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Panorama Research Incorporated
Proposal award date
2023-09-26
Contract end date
2024-08-31
UEI
LYVHC3ARFRJ7
Solicitation number
PA22-176
Topic code
NIAMS

Research abstract

Novel therapy for arthrofibrosis AbstractArthrofibrosis (AF) is a common result of joint surgeries. The formation of collagen-rich fibrotic scars is unconditionally necessary for AF and suggests an effective therapeutic approach. Collagen fibrils are formed in the extracellular space by aggregation of individual collagen I molecules (monomers) produced by cells in response to injury. The assembly of collagen I molecules into fibrils depends on the binding interaction between the very ends, i.e., telopeptides, of one collagen molecule and the telopeptide binding region (TBR) of an interacting partner. Blocking the C-terminal telopeptide of the α2(I) chain of collagen I α2(I)Ct with an anti-α2(I)Ct antibody (referred to as ACA, Anti-Collagen Antibody) inhibits monomer-monomer interaction, thereby inhibiting collagen fibril formation and reducing unwanted scarring. While fibril-incorporated collagen I molecules are stable in vivo, free collagen molecules that are not part of the fibrils (e.g., due to blocking with the ACA) are not stable and therefore undergo degradation. The extent of the inhibition of collagen fibril formation is ACA-concentration dependent. Thus, reducing the excess of collagen-rich deposits and blocking only a fraction of all produced collagen I molecules still allows collagen fibrils to be formed and enables effective healing. Our in vivo studies in a rabbit model of posttraumatic joint stiffness showed no adverse effects of the ACA. For potential clinical use, we have humanized the ACA.During this Phase I project, we will improve delivery and tissue residence by linking a collagen-binding peptide (CBP) to our lead humanized ACA. The CBP domain will target the antibody to sites of ongoing collagen fibril formation. Gradual release from collagen in affected regions that synthesize α2(I)Ct will facilitate long-term treatment, enabling the ACA to inhibit ongoing fibrosis. We will characterize the construct in vitro to ensure the required binding and developability and begin in vivo evaluation in a model of AF. Phase 2 work will further evaluate ACA-CBP in additional animal models of AF and begin IND-enabling preclinical studies.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

149 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2025). Reported award amounts total $35,373,004. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.