SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I:Massively Parallel Protocols for Software-based Wireless Systems

Award identifier 4eaa427ff8c5c8e93f4c3ba17a487e67ad239202938d5b1507087fe55e019f61Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$273,383

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
LUTRIS, INC.
Proposal award date
2023-09-15
Contract end date
2024-08-31
UEI
ZE76YE8D9PM5
Solicitation number
NSF 23-515
Topic code
IT

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project lies in its potential to implement state-of-the-art radio communication systems faster and less expensively. Radio systems are an essential part of everyday life, serving roles from entertainment to public safety. But modern radio systems, designed to use the limited number of available frequencies efficiently, are expensive to develop and deploy. A major reason for the high cost is that custom silicon chips are needed to do the processing that converts a weak radio signal into useful data.This project aims to make radio systems much cheaper to build. Instead of building custom chips, the team uses commodity computers and specially designed software that can run the radio processing tasks at high speed. This speed is enabled by technology that analyzes radio processing tasks and turns them into software which runs on a processor with many individual computing cores.The economic impact is twofold: that technology can reduce the cost of existing systems, such as cellular LTE and 5G base stations, it also makes possible new applications which are too expensive to build from custom hardware._x000D_ _x000D_ This SBIR Phase I project seeks to understand how to develop the processing needed in modern radio system quickly and efficiently.The team also seeks to address the features of communications protocols that are hard to implement because the computations are too complicated or too much data needs to be examined before the final output is generated. They will also address the opportunities to change the protocol to eliminate the bottlenecks. The technology will measure the how fast key radio algorithms run on commodity computing hardware and how much time is spent on essential, but not productive, tasks such as moving data between memories. The objective is a quantitative estimate of how much data can be transmitted or received by a radio implemented purely in software. Ultimately, the team will design protocols that scale with the number of processor cores: twice as many processors giving twice the data throughput._x000D_ _x000D_ This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,694,473. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.