SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Non-Contact, Wireless Sensor System for Remote and Long-Term Monitoring of Internal Conditions of Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry-Storage Canisters

Award identifier 648b1987c7f3af87938ec53c0c7eae8ee15a142dcc092502c27a319c83a46433Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
X-Wave Innovations, Inc.
Proposal award date
2023-08-28
Contract end date
2025-08-27
UEI
EDJ3MSJR9NK7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C54-37b

Research abstract

A major concern with nuclear energy is the safe storage of the spent nuclear fuel before final disposal. A monitoring sensor located inside a storage canister to provide direct measurements of internal conditions is of particular interest to DOE. Conventional wireless sensors have inherent limitations because the stainless steel canister shields the RF signals from wireless sensors inside the canister to communicate with outside devices. In this proposal, X-wave Innovations, Inc. proposes a non-contact, wireless sensor system (NCWSS) capable of monitoring the internal conditions of stainless steel nuclear waste dry-storage canisters by placing a set of wireless sensors inside the canister and acquiring the measurement signals outside through the thick steel wall without any cable running through. The proposed NCWSS approach is based on XII-developed wireless power and signal transfer technologies. In the Phase II program, we will extend our Phase I success and develop a fully-functional NCWSS prototype and demonstrate the abilities of the proposed technique for long-term monitoring of internal conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, gas species) inside a sealed stainless-steel canister and wirelessly interrogating data through the thick steel wall without direct connection. The proposed non-contact, wireless sensor system provides an in-situ, reliable, accurate, and low-cost sensor technology for remote, and long-term monitoring of the internal conditions of a spent nuclear fuel dry-storage canister. This sensor technology can also be used to monitor internal conditions and prevent catastrophic failure of pressure vessels of nuclear reactors, mission-critical components in aerospace vehicles, chemistry and oil refinement industry to improve the reliability, reduce maintenance costs, and extend the service life of those systems while maintaining their safety and reliability. Many other industries and government agencies dealing with structural condition/health monitoring will directly benefit from this sensor technology.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

92 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2025). Reported award amounts total $30,524,673. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.