SBIR/STTR Research Award

3D Printed Ablative Re-Entry Vehicle Heat Shields

Award identifier e8eb02fbd46a7a2dcc69c2895d35273b71be62e8ffa250ac797a8bf7d4eb23f8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Logistics Agency

Award amount

$99,997

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Logistics Agency
Recipient company
MANTIS COMPOSITES INC
Proposal award date
2023-08-23
Contract end date
2024-02-23
UEI
MKHDHZVD1LL8
Solicitation number
23.A
Topic code
DLA23A-003

Research abstract

Re-Entry Vehicles (RVs) are a critical component of the strategic weapon arsenal. While physics packages themselves have a substantial deterrence value, the ability to deliver those weapons quickly and with high survivability unlocks the ability to maintain a truly global deterrence. However, these thermal protection systems are encountering two developing challenges: Industrial Base Attrition: The long intervals between refresh cycles for re-entry vehicles means that the industrial base sees high attrition between revisions. Interceptor Survivability: As radar and missile defense systems become more advanced and less expensive to deploy, the performance of RVs needs to improve to ensure survivability to target. Solving these challenges requires a production system that solves the business and technical challenges associated with these respectively. Some key considerations for these are listed below: Industrial Base Attrition Business Goals: Broad use-base materials and processes that can lean on non-RV equipment, processes, and demand. Interceptor Survivability Technical Goals: Improved thermal and mechanical performance including shape surface finish retention. Mantis Composites, teamed with Sandia National Laboratories, aims to address these challenges by leveraging an existing capability to 3D print continuous carbon fiber with high temperature thermoplastics and known methods of modifying the underlying polymers to improve ablative thermal performance. This combination has the potential to enable heat shields with improved shape retention, higher thermal and mechanical performance, and better surface finish retention by combining highly engineered carbon fiber orientations with materials that inherently maintain performance at elevated temperatures. This Phase I will consist of material-level testing using existing production machines to validate the capabilities of the proposed manufacturing system in ablative re-entry vehicle heat shield applications. Critically, by leveraging existing technologies with substantial applications in both defense and commercial spaces, this capability is not dependent on strategic weapons to maintain viability.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2025). Reported award amounts total $9,474,345. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.