Research abstract
Parental divorce and separation constitute an adverse childhood experience and a risk factor for a number
of childhood behavioral, psychological, and academic problems. The act of parental divorce or separation does
not in itself cause adverse outcomes in children. Rather, co-occurring negative family processes, particularly
high inter-parental conflict (HIC), explain most of the variance. Although many families experience conflict in
the first year after divorce, it typically decreases over time. In contrast to normal conflict, for 10%-25% of
couples, HIC endures and puts children at risk for negative outcomes. The literature broadly defines HIC
following divorce and separation to include anger, an extreme lack of trust, unresolved grief, hostile contempt,
uncooperative co-parenting, verbal and physical fighting, and legal conflict between the parents.Courts are moving towards triaged approaches to manage family law cases. Aligned with this model,
almost every state or local jurisdiction requires parents to complete a brief (3- to 4-hour), universal parenting
education course before finalizing a divorce. Unfortunately, existing court-mandated universal parent education
interventions fail to address the unique parenting challenges presented by HIC separation. There is a critical
need to develop interventions to ameliorate negative consequences for children of divorcing and separating
parents with HIC.To meet this need, we propose to develop and evaluate Putting Children First (PCF), an affordable and
highly scalable online intervention featuring digitally adapted motivational interviewing strategies paired with
evidence-based parent training resources. In contrast to most universal parenting interventions provided by
family courts that promote co-parenting, PCF emphasizes parallel parenting, a strategy that we hypothesize to
be more effective for families experiencing HIC.The proposed PCF intervention will be based on Parent Management Program-Oregon (PMTO), a well-
established, in-person parenting intervention shown to improve child, parent, and family outcomes. Although
PMTO is effective when adapted for divorcing parents, it has not been adapted nor systematically evaluated for
couples experiencing HIC during separation. The PCF intervention will identify and overcome barriers to
engagement with this population by incorporating brief motivational interviewing, a strategy that increases an
individual's motivation to make behavioral changes by focusing on their need for and reasons for change.The project incorporates three aims in two phases.In Phase I, we aim to complete four tasks: (1) interview judicial stakeholders to tailor the implementation
framework and approach to meet the needs of the court system administration; (2) conduct design research to
adapt the instructional and motivational approach to parents with HIC involved in a separation or divorce; (3)
develop content for four training modules and a high-fidelity prototype of the course site; (4) assess usability of
the prototype using a think-aloud protocol and follow-up semi-structured interviews with parents with HIC.In Phase II, Aim 1, the project team will engage in design research to complete content development for
the PCF intervention. In Aim 2, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted with 250 dyads (i.e.,
divorcing/divorced/separated parents with HIC) to evaluate the PCF intervention. Dyads will be recruited
through a partnership with the Indiana Supreme Court and will be randomized to business as usual (BAU) or to
BAU+PCF. We hypothesize that:1. Compared to BAU, BAU+PCF will (a) increase parent self‐efficacy, (b) decrease parental stress, (c)
increase parental knowledge, (d) increase parental motivation to engage with the intervention, (f) improve the
quality of parent-child relationships, and (g) improve parent-reported child stress and prosocial behaviors.2. Parents with higher levels of conflict will be more responsive to parallel parenting, and increased parallel
parenting among HIC dyads will reduce child adjustment problems.
Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.
Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.
58 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2025). Reported award amounts total $27,741,009. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.