SBIR/STTR Research Award

SEAL: A generalized framework for deploying a secure application lifecycle management process with CI/CD

Award identifier 1a7cdb6e6edde8169108b051a38cedf3e9e035060b4fc1ce87b3b43bfd6ab129Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Award amount

$1,099,942

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Recipient company
EP ANALYTICS, INC..
Proposal award date
2023-08-01
Contract end date
2025-08-01
UEI
J8CCA7S8L518
Solicitation number
21.2
Topic code
DTRA212-004

Research abstract

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) uses High-Fidelity (HF) computer codes, many of which are legacy codes that have evolved over many years, to investigate weapon effects phenomenology and techniques for countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). As DTRA’s reliance on HF codes for tasks critical to national security continues to increase, transitioning such codes from legacy coding practices to modern practices becomes paramount. This transition to modern practices through the use of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) frameworks will allow HF code developers to carefully monitor and control the evolution of the codes to ensure software development best practices are adopted, the code changes are thoroughly vetted for security, accuracy, and performance before the changes make their way into the mainline (or shared source code base) and released to the customers. EP Analytics is developing SEAL (for Secure ALM), which is a framework that enables transitioning legacy codes to a modern ALM framework. The foundation of the SEAL framework has evolved from years of experience in software modernization and performance analysis of large complex HPC applications. Legacy codes come with unique dependencies, requirements, and complexities that can pose hurdles during modernization. These hurdles may be caused by technical (e.g., breaking changes during technology stack upgrade) or social (e.g., reluctance to rapid technical changes by key personnel) factors. Cognizant of these factors, a key design goal of the SEAL framework is to be extensible, technology agnostic, and incremental. In Phase I, EP Analytics successfully demonstrated the feasibility of applying the SEAL framework to develop and demonstrate a working prototype of an automated CI/CD pipeline within an application container for SHAMRC, a legacy HF DTRA code. The automation entailed developing multiple enabling software artifacts/tools to support code builds, establishing test oracles (or truth values) for existing tests, executing tests, validating the test results, analyzing code coverage, and generating reports. EP Analytics and ARA tested the pipeline on multiple HPCMP systems (Narwhal, Onyx, and Mustang) and ARA’s local development cluster.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

16 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2025). Reported award amounts total $6,773,808. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.