SBIR/STTR Research Award

Powder Injection Molding Processes for Manufacture of Fast Reactor Nuclear Fuels

Award identifier dd68a1898f4f9b1f1e42f913a375be0a0ce60c9a6562d14bf9a6be0ba35a40ecAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$194,162

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
J FOSTER & ASSOCIATES LLC
Proposal award date
2023-07-10
Contract end date
2024-07-09
UEI
N3SLB1KDDRB5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002903
Topic code
C56-40v

Research abstract

Current methods of manufacturing sodium fast reactor (SFR) fuels are constrained to small window of manufacturability. Powder forming processes could provide unique material advantages over traditional casting and extrusion techniques; however, fuel materials in powder form are highly reactive with oxygen and represent a pyrophoric hazard. U and Pu alloys and ceramics are easily dispersible in powder form and require significant radiological protection for the safety of fuel workers. General statement of how this problem is being addressed: A powder injection molding (PIM) process could provide a viable economic alternative to traditional manufacturing methods for SFR fuels. PIM is capable of complex geometries that could unlock new performance potential in SFR fuels relative to currently achievable designs. Furthermore, PIM enables the use of powder in fuel manufacturing through polymer encapsulation which protects the fuel from oxidation and mitigates facility contamination. The encapsulated feedstock can then be molded as an SFR fuel slug or integrated fuel-clad system through a novel two-component PIM (2C-PIM) process. The molded parts can then undergo debinding and sintering to achieve high density fuel materials. JFoster & Associates, LLC (JFA) will develop PIM processes as an alternative solution for the manufacture of fast reactor nuclear fuels. This will entail determination of processing parameters to manufacture fuel slugs, fuel-clad integrated materials, and related methods to form a diffusion barrier at the fuel-clad interface. JFA will demonstrate these techniques using surrogate metallic alloys to simulate typical SFR fuel and cladding materials based on solidus temperature. These results will lay the foundation for Phase II work with uranium-bearing materials as well as further development of JFA feedstock processes and capabilities for SFR fuels. JFA anticipates benefit to the nuclear industry through simplified fuel fabrication that enhances the economic viability of SFR deployment. This would provide benefit to the general public through establishing a closed fuel cycle thus ensuring the sustainability of nuclear energy well into the future. JFA aims to deliver these solutions in the form of fuel technologies and related services.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023). Reported award amounts total $386,294. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.