SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Cost, High Performance SiC Junction Barrier Schottky Diodes for Grid Applications

Award identifier 2b9848e5d4d056120d1bd96f6e04cbf4c5c7bd0f4fbda75970daa0ac10232005Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$206,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ThinSiC Inc.
Proposal award date
2023-07-10
Contract end date
2024-04-09
UEI
X5WWGRMF96H5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002903
Topic code
C56-08a

Research abstract

ThinSiC proposes to demonstrate the feasibility of making ultra-thin silicon carbide (SiC) Junction Barrier Schottky Diodes (JBSD) with vastly improved thermal conduction, lower defect density, lower cost of production, and eliminating the need to waste SiC substrates, as done in standard manufacturing methods. Here, ThinSiC will also identify failure modes and unanticipated hurdles in production prior to scalability. Our approach combines lateral SiC epitaxy and our proprietary separation method. ThinSiC has already demonstrated in the lab separation of thin single crystal epitaxial SiC layers from the SiC substrate. Thus, understanding and quantifying the impact of these methods on device performance will retire a significant risk to productization. Since SiC JSBDs can be drop-in replacements for Si JSBDs while operating at higher efficiencies, this proposed Phase I project has the potential to have meaningful near-term market impact. SiC is widely viewed as a “better” material for high-power power electronics (PE) applications because of its higher bandgap, higher breakdown voltage and higher thermal conductivity. However SiC is expensive to use and traditional manufacturing approaches result in relatively thick devices that do not fully capitalize on the material properties. Today, SiC dies cost 10x more than their Si counterpart, and packaged SiCbased devices are 3X more costly than equivalent Si devices. This is due entirely to the dramatically higher SiC substrate cost. Furthermore, n production, 70% of the SiC substrate is wasted by grinding - a required step in conventional manufacturing approaches to achieve a thinner substrate for reduced RDSon. This significantly drives up costs of using SiC substrates in JSBD. ThinSiC’s technology addresses this problem by completely eliminating the grinding step in vertical power device fabrication. Not only does ThinSiC’s approach allow reuse of individual wafers, it allows for the manufacture of very thin devices without subjecting the dies to the mechanical stress of grinding. Lowering the costs of SiC for JSBD, and eventually other SiC devices, will expand the utilization of SiC in commercial products by improving their utility, affordability, and accessibility. Replacement of Si power electronics devices with SiC devices is a readily achievable route to higher efficiency and higher performance power electronics for high power applications (grid switches, power conditioners, inverters, etc.), if the production costs can be lowered by 30-50%. If successful, ThinSiC will proceed toward Phase II to further optimize our approach preparation for scalability by expanding the process on a 6-in SiC wafer and ensuring the separation of the ultra-thin layer from the substrate can be performed without damaging the epilayer. ThinSiC will perform long-term stability testing and pursue pilot testing with an industry partner.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.