SBIR/STTR Research Award

Internal Surface Finishing of Additively Manufactured RF Components for Fusion Reactor Applications

Award identifier f423638adeb1e15453ae3dcdef839449e9ddf5a989423f18e506dafa1c45a5a5Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$197,978

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
REM Chemicals, Inc. d/b/a/ REM Surface Engineering
Proposal award date
2023-07-10
Contract end date
2024-05-09
UEI
NJU9AZL2QFB7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002903
Topic code
C56-29a

Research abstract

Statement of the Problem: In a reactor environment, plasma material interaction (PMI) issues associated with radio frequency (RF) coupling structures are similar to those for the first wall and have been identified as a potential problem. A primary challenge is to obtain high power, breakdown resistant density couplers with low loss compatible with fusion plasmas. Advanced manufacturing techniques, i.e. additive manufacturing (AM), enable optimized RF structures to improve coupler performance; however, as-printed AM metal surfaces contain numerous surface and near-surface defects which can reduce performance and/or serve as failure points. A post-process surface finishing technique is required to facilitate successful AM implementation. General statement of how this problem is being addressed: REM proposes to address the PMI issues associated with RF coupling structures by utilizing additive manufacturing to maximize the benefits of AM specific alloys that, we believe, are optimized for these uses/environments. In order to fully realize the potential of the AM alloys, components must be surface finished. It is expected that the planarized and smoothed surfaces of the components will optimize the performance of the AM RF components, thus increasing the expected life and efficiency of the reactor, while potentially lowering its total lifecycle costs. What is to be done in Phase I? During Phase I, REM proposes to develop surface polishing processes for internal surfaces on applicable RF component geometries manufactured in GRCop-42 and molybdenum from wrought, AM, and/or plated forming techniques. Processes will be designed to produce <0.3 µm Ra roughnesses, be controllable to +/- 15 µm, and maintain critical geometries/part features. Samples will be produced utilizing the developed polishing processes. Preliminary testing of these samples will be performed at MIT to evaluate RF performance and demonstrate proof-of-concept. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: As the plasma fusion market is as yet purely theoretical/academic in nature, exact market size for this specific application is difficult to define. It is understood that the endgame application for the SPARC and subsequently ARC fusion reactors is to supplant existing fossil-fuel driven power plants (steam turbines). As the global steam turbine market was valued at $24.1 billion in 2019, it would seem logical to suggest that the value of fusion technology-enabling RF component surface finishing processes could conservatively be in the $1 – 20 million range. [1] Primary customers would be fusion reactor producers. As no commercial producers currently exist, it would be assumed that traditional gas and steam turbine producers would step into this market: Siemens, GE, and Mitsuibishi. However, initial commercialization would be focused on government sponsored and/or university driven plasma fusion reactor projects such as SPARC, ITER, JET, and others. Looking beyond the plasma fusion market, GRCop alloys are being rapid adopted by the rocket propulsion industry (both public and private) for use in combustion chamber/combustion chamber liner applications. The rocket propulsion market was valued at $4.23 billion in 2018. [2] As LPBF combustion chambers can cost ~$35,000 – $50,000/each, and commercial rocket designs can contain 10 – 20 such components, it is reasonable to assume that an advanced GRCop alloy polishing process could produce >$150,000 per rocket. Primary customer targets who are known to be using or evaluating GRCop alloys include: Relativity Space, Sierra Nevada Corporation, Blue Origin, Virgin Orbit, and Launcher. It is expected that additional companies will adopt GRCop alloys as increased hot fire testing and other proof of performance data is made available. Additionally, non-plasma fusion waveguide applications for the GRCop alloys are broad, and include the satellite market, as well as medical devices, such as magnetic images devices. Companies such as Bridge12 and Swissto12 are actively producing waveguides and antennas via AM, and their end-use applications would be well suited to the GRCop alloys if they could be coupled with an adequate internal surface polishing process.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2025). Reported award amounts total $5,283,499. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.