SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced Manufacturing of MOF-based Hydrogen Storage Tanks, Topic 26c

Award identifier 537e0dbf3327cf7befc74b0281ebce1bcb49d00c3cb4233158d542d19f31fddaAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$256,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NANOSONIC INC.
Proposal award date
2023-07-10
Contract end date
2024-04-09
UEI
ZK7ECNMN7MM5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002903
Topic code
C56-26c

Research abstract

There is a need to utilize advanced manufacturing concepts to improve hydrogen storage tank materials through the introduction of porous materials. Here, metal organic framework-based composites will be produced through high yield, low-cost approaches for testing as material for hydrogen storage tanks. The goals for this program are to demonstrate improvements in metal organic framework-based materials towards meeting hydrogen storage targets, and producing a material that resists hydrogen embrittlement. This program will entail engineering metal organic framework composites to deliver a densely packed, hierarchically porous composite with enhanced hydrogen binding sites to improve workable hydrogen storage capacity. These metal organic framework composites will be processable through advanced manufacturing techniques for prototype development. Using our partners, the hydrogen storage capacity and embrittlement resistance will be tested and used to down select promising material. By engineering the metal organic framework material, hydrogen storage capacity approaching 1.7 kg/L will be maintained through 5000 system cycles. In this program, a metal organic framework composite material will be developed for the purpose of advanced manufacturing hydrogen storage tanks. The compounded material will be tested by hydrogen adsorption isotherms, hydrogen swing cycle tests, and scanning electron microscope imaging to determine binding enthalpy, storage capacity, and material stability. Pricing shall be estimated during Phase I and included in the commercialization plan with a goal to reduce the overall capital cost. The proposed hydrogen storage materials differ from the current technology by the inclusion of metal organic frameworks, which offer specific binding sites for hydrogen and allow for storage at higher temperatures and pressures. Porous, printable hydrogen storage material shall be beneficial as high-capacity storage material with less energy requirements than liquid or compressed storage. These experiments shall benefit the nation by reducing the energy requirements of hydrogen storage to encourage the transition away from carbon-based fuels.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

469 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2026). Reported award amounts total $155,330,549. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.