SBIR/STTR Research Award

CBM+ and RBM with an Energy Management Approach

Award identifier 0c49bba1bfd5420cabc1d69ee6e0227994aec1ac4f546c3f094ef6be716de7bcAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$1,557,569

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
MAPLEWELL INC
Proposal award date
2023-07-03
Contract end date
2026-05-27
UEI
YKFUSYPDGNE4
Solicitation number
21.1
Topic code
N211-074

Research abstract

By adapting energy models from the utility industry, NAVSEA can create scalable energy models and meet CBM and RBM objectives. Maplewell’s Energy Management Control System (EMCS) monitors energy consumption and production, and energy models capture mechanical, electrical, material, and chemical problems and diagnose the condition of an asset or system. The EMCS harnesses energy models to monitor performance “degradation” and empowers decision makers to apply the correct maintenance strategies; decreased energy performance correlates with decreased reliability, resiliency, and efficiency. The EMCS solution also provides secure data transfer and a flexible communication interface with the Navy ERM; the EMCS acts as a supervisory control that pushes data to an “edge controller” for dynamic data processing and predictive control and then to the Cloud. Maplewell’s EMCS solution improves reliability at the asset level, builds resiliency at the system level, and ultimately improves fleet efficiency at the ship level. The EMCS architecture moves beyond reliability functions set by design standards, OEM recommendations, and standard maintenance methods; it integrates each asset’s distinctive energy model and reliability function signature and defines their impact on performance and reliability. With an EMCS, energy models can quantify the degradation by creating a digital twin of an asset, system, or ship that operating equipment uses as a reference for improvement; the EMCS also characterizes the reliability function and determines the effect of maintenance on reliability. Our model-based approach builds resiliency by enabling benchmarking to compare and identify relative performance and risk at the system level. Comparing relative performance between energy models of the same assets, systems, and ships identifies needs for maintenance or upgrades and enables shipyards to shift from reactive maintenance to predictive work packages. The EMCS also builds resiliency by defining and tracking the reliability function to quantify the risk of system failure, manage risk with maintenance, and improve upon standard practices. Changes in a ship’s mission and function also affect efficiency and cause a ship to operate outside of its intended design. By monitoring the ship’s systems (i.e., the power cycle), the EMCS can identify degradations in performance and capture longer-term trends for analysis to improve fleet efficiency and suggest new design standards.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2023). Reported award amounts total $1,797,321. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.