SBIR/STTR Research Award

Hybrid Manufacturing Process of Loop Heat Pipe Evaporator

Award identifier 0378c593bae85b82ec117e5b08eabf52d10bccc0eada3c971a70057762a747b0Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$899,982

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
Proposal award date
2023-06-15
Contract end date
2025-06-14
UEI
Z8KVZV3DR7J4
Solicitation number
SBIR_22_P2
Topic code
S16

Research abstract

Currently, to ensure the effective heat transfer of Loop Heat Pipes (LHPs), the Knife Edge Seal (KES) in the LHP evaporator is a key component that seals the primary wick and prevents high-pressure vapor from entering the lower-pressure interior of the evaporator and compensation chamber (CC).nbsp; However, the KES may be susceptible to failure after long-time exposure to thermal cycles and vibration.nbsp; Additionally, the KES insertion process is labor intensive and has an intrinsic risk that may increase the lead time and cost.nbsp;To address the challenge, Advanced Cooling Technologies, Inc. (ACT), in collaboration with FormAlloy, Inc., utilized Direct Energy Deposition (DED), an Additive Manufacturing (AM) technique, to eliminate the KES, improve the LHP reliability and performance, streamline the LHP manufacturing process, and further enable innovative LHP designs.nbsp;In the Phase I Program, we have successfully demonstrated using DED technology to deposit dense sealing layers on a testing specimen and thus eliminate the KES.nbsp; The DED seal improves the overall LHP reliability and performance while lowering the cost and the lead time. Further, we have successfully demonstrated the operation of a complete LHP with a DED-sealed evaporator.nbsp;The Phase II Program will optimize the DED process and further leverage the DED to the LHP fabrication process. Specifically, we will optimize the DED conditions including laser power, scanning paths, etc.nbsp; In addition, we will conduct reliability and lifetime tests for the DED-sealed parts.nbsp; ACT will also compare the performance of KES-sealed LHP with that of DED-sealed LHP.nbsp; Further, we will develop Functional Gradient Material (FGM) that transits from aluminum alloy to nickel to further streamline the LHP manufacturing process.nbsp; Finally, we will leverage the AM nature of the DED process to enable different CC and the evaporator body shape designs. By the end of Phase II, a complete hybrid manufactured LHP is one major deliverable to NASA.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

282 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2026). Reported award amounts total $118,415,811. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.