SBIR/STTR Research Award

Structure-based computational engineering of saCas9 PAM requirement

Award identifier ba91334d0a23a03390bf5bbe31c2cf473b25e624e6d8179604c0d9a1af4171ebAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$274,955

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ATGC Inc.
Proposal award date
2023-04-01
Contract end date
2024-03-31
UEI
F3KRQG95DCF6
Solicitation number
PA22-178
Topic code
400

Research abstract

ABSTRACT SaCas9 is a major gene editing nuclease that is preferred for in vivo applications thanks to its relatively smaller size compared to that of spCas9. One limiting factor for the use of saCas9 is its strict PAM requirement of NNGRRT. In addition, there are limited efforts to reduce saCas9’s off-target editing rates. In Aim 1, we propose a computational approach to relax saCas9’s PAM requirement. We hypothesize that the interactions between key PAM recognition (KPR) residues of saCas9 and the side chains of PAM nucleotides determine the PAM requirement, and that mutating KPR residues by destroying their interactions with the DNA side chain while introducing favorable interactions with the DNA main chain will relax the PAM requirement. We have demonstrated the feasibility to relax the PAM requirement to NNNRRT in preliminary work. Here we will develop and optimize a computational method UniDesign to engineer saCas9s with further relaxed NNNRRN PAM (rr-saCas9s). In Aim 2, we propose to improve rr-saCas9’s safety. Recently we reported the development of mispCas9, in which a small size (36 amino acids) HDR (homology-directed repair)-promoting peptide Brex27 was fused to spCas9. Compared to spCas9, mispCas9 leads to increased knock-in rates as well as reduced off-target insertion and deletion (indel) events. Importantly, Brex27 can be used as a “plug and play” module to improve other gene-editing nucleases as long as their mechanism of action depends on the generation of double-strand breaks (DSB) of the genome. Here we will fuse Brex27 to rr- saCas9 (mirr-saCas9), and conduct experiments to characterize mirr-saCas9, in comparison with rr-saCas9 and saCas9, with a focus on PAM requirement, on-target editing efficacy, and off-target rates. The proposed mirr-saCas9, if successful, will add favorable features to saCas9 including: (i) 16 times more targetable sequences as a result of the relaxed PAM requirement (NNNRRN vs NNGRRT); and (ii) reduced off-target indel rates as a result of enhanced HDR at off-target sites. Furthermore, the validated computational model is adaptable for the improvement of other CRISPR variants for PAM modification and other desirable engineering.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2023). Reported award amounts total $4,801,284. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.