SBIR/STTR Research Award

Non-PFAS Elastomeric Chemical Barrier Materials

Award identifier e9f59dbbeb7ba52e98647e10e44b351cd73fa29cfebd7a9ecee05308285a48d9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Office for Chemical and Biological Defense

Award amount

$182,927

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
Recipient company
MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES CORP.
Proposal award date
2023-02-28
Contract end date
2023-08-27
UEI
FQ1PKJZ9XME3
Solicitation number
22.2
Topic code
CBD222-001

Research abstract

Chemical, Biological, Radioactive, and Nuclear (CBRN) protective items are typically comprised of an elastomeric element to impart barrier properties, while allowing a range of movement and flexibility to the person wearing the wearing them. The elastomers used in protective equipment often have fluoropolymer components or fluoropolymer-based coatings applied to enhance their barrier properties. Fluoropolymers and the fluorinated compounds used in their production are in a class of chemicals called per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and have been used in industry and commercial products for many years, and they are emitted into the environment and people are exposed to them at all stages of a fluoropolymer’s life cycle. The discovery of the widespread presence of PFAS in the environment, wildlife, and human blood triggered large-scale investigations into their persistence and health effects. The results have prompted increased scrutiny of the usage and disposal of PFAS-containing materials by governmental agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD), which may impact the procurement and use of clothing treated with PFAS-containing materials. The Chemical and Biological Defense Program (CBD) is seeking to address this issue through the development of a novel, non-PFAS elastomeric barrier material for CBRN protective items that provides protection against liquid and vapor chemical threats while maintaining flexibility and durability. The new elastomeric barrier material should possess the properties for protective materials described in the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1994 Class 1 standard, including chemical permeability, puncture, tear, and flame resistance. Methods to integrate the non-PFAS elastomeric material with other functional materials used in CBRN protective equipment will need to be developed. METSS will meet CBD’s requirements by leveraging its significant experience in the development of chemical-resistant elastomeric laminate materials, including CBRN gloves, and chemical warfare agent (CWA) simulant testing. DoE statistical analysis will be used during development efforts to streamline product selection, optimize material components, and identify any synergies between them.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

143 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2025). Reported award amounts total $47,752,514. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.